Go to mapGo to mapGo to map
<< Back to Contents
APPENDIX 5 - THE NEED FOR AFFORDABLE DWELLINGS
   
1. The 1996 Housing Needs Study prepared by David Couttie Associates revealed 4,500 concealed households in the district. Of these 3,050 expressed a wish to remain in the district in their own accommodation. This figure was used as the starting point in calculating the district wide requirement for Affordable Housing.
2. From the 3,050 households the Private Housing Officer deducted the 1,006 whose incomes were sufficient to permit them to access the regular housing market. A further 290 households were registered on a City Council/Housing Association Waiting List whose needs it was assumed would be satisfied by the turnover in the existing stock. This reduced the requirement for Affordable Homes to 1,754 units.
3. At the time the David Couttie Associates Report was being prepared 165 affordable units were already committed in principle. This assumed 85 Housing Association Units and 80 Affordable units at Mossgate, Heysham. Deducting these produces a residual requirement of 1,589 units.
   
  The supply of Affordable Dwellings
4. The Table below sets out the Council's set-by-step approach in arriving at a District Wide Affordable Housing Target.
 
    Dwellings
1 No. of Concealed Households, provides proxy for number of Affordable Homes required, (source – DCA Survey)
4,500
2 Concealed Households not wishing to stay in district
1,450
3 Concealed Households on housing waiting lists whose needs will eventually be met through re-lets
290
4 Concealed Households whose income permits them to access the market
1,006
5 Anticipated Housing Association dwellings arising from continuation of current HA completion rate
1,020
6 District Wide Affordable Housing requirement
734
7 Total New Dwelling Requirement
5,726
8 Residual Dwelling Requirement 1996-2006 from which an element of Affordable Dwellings will be sought
3,682
   
5. Note: Figure 6 includes the 80 Affordable Dwellings committed in principal at Mossgate and currently being developed by the Home Housing Association. For the purposes of inclusion in Policy H10 the City Council has rounded this figure up to 'about 740 dwellings'. Determining the District Wide proportion of new dwellings which the Affordable Housing Target represents outstanding Dwelling Requirement at 1996. When the Private Housing Officer prepared his report of the 19th March 1996 it was in respect of the outstanding Lancashire Structure Plan derived dwelling requirement at that time.
6. Note: Figure 7 is the September 1995 residual dwelling requirement, it excludes the student requirement. This figure is contained in para 2.2.4 of the November 1996 consultation Draft Local Plan.This is the figure that provides the base from which we determine what proportion of new dwellings to be completed in the remaining years of the plan should be Affordable. Of these 5,726 dwellings 2,544 already had permission in 1996, this leaves a total of 3,182 plots on which, starting in mid 1996, development had not been approved and so could contribute an element of Affordable Dwellings to the district wide target. If it is assumed that about one fifth, 500 of the 2,544 plots which had permission at the start of the period lapse, and either;
 
  • Become the subject of new applications, and therefore present an fresh opportunity to seek affordable dwellings, or,
  • Are not the subject of new planning applications within this local plan period and their dwelling contribution is 'replaced' by completions on other unidentified sites which present an opportunity to seek affordable dwellings,
  then this would add a further 500 dwellings bringing the total to 3,682 total.
7. 20% of 3,682 dwellings is 736, again the City Council has rounded this up to 740 dwellings. This is the target figure for Affordable Dwellings which the Council will seek to secure through negotiation from approvals for residential development in the Local Plan period.
8. The base date for the Lancaster District Local Plan is mid 1996 while the above figures are deducted from a base date of September 1995, however, as no Affordable Dwellings units were actually achieved in this period so the target figure is unaffected.
9. Of the total number of concealed households around 70% are based in the main urban area of Lancaster, Morecambe and Heysham. It follows that around 70%, of the stock of new affordable homes, about 520 dwellings, should be developed within suitable sites in the urban area.
   
  Assessment of Sites identified in Policy H10 for Affordable Housing
  Part A: Development Requirement & Costs
 
  New Roads/
Access
Other Infrastructure Site Reclamation Landscaping & Open Space Recreation & Social Facilities Summary
Development Costs Burden
Royal Albert A B B B B B
Lancaster Moor North B A B B A B
St Georges Works C A A C C A
Pyes Feedmill C B A C C c
  A = Significant
B = Typical Requirement
C = Minimal Requirement
  Note) A shaded box indicates a particularly significant burden
   
  Part B: Locational Attributes/Suitability for Affordable Housing
 
  Proximity to Employment Services Potential Range of Dwelling Types Access to Public Transport Proximity to Schools (Existing or Proposed) Access to Children’s Playspace Summary
Suitability for Affordable Housing
Royal Albert B A A B A A
Lancaster Moor North C A B B A B
St Georges Works B C B B B C
Pyes Feedmill A C A C B C
  A = Excellent
B = Average
C = Poor
  Note) a shaded box indicates Particularly Excellent Locational Attributes
   
  Part C: Individual Site Target for Affordable Dwellings
 
  Total Dwellings to 2006 Affordable Dwellings
(Site Target)
Royal Albert 350 70
Lancaster Moor North 0 0
St George’s Works 150 30
Pye’s Feedmill 100 20
TOTAL 1445 275
   
   
Top of chapter