 |
|
|
| CHAPTER 3 - The Local Economy |
| |
|
|
| 3.1 |
Background
- the Local Economy |
| 3.2 |
Business
Development Sites |
| 3.3 |
Improving
the District's Existing Employment Areas |
| 3.4 |
The
Office Sector |
| 3.5 |
Maintaining
and Enhancing the District's Shopping Centres |
| 3.6 |
Tourism
and Commercial Leisure Development |
| |
| This part of the Local
Plan contains the Council's policies for employment, shopping and
tourism development. It allocates sites for new business and industry.
It sets out criteria for development in existing industrial areas.
It contains policies on office development. It sets out the District's
shopping hierarchy, the approach to new shopping development and protecting
the District's shopping centres. Finally it identifies opportunities
for tourism related development. |
| |
|
| |
The City Council's Policies aim to: |
| |
- increase local employment opportunities and reduce the need
for commuting out of the District;
- provide sites to meet the development needs of existing and
potential employers;
- maintain and develop the district's existing employment areas
and shopping centres;
- encourage sectors with growth potential such as education and
port related development;
- continue the successful development of tourism and leisure in
the District; and
- encourage diversification and employment development in the
rural economy.
|
| |
The City Council proposes: |
| |
- a business park at Bailrigg;
- sites for new businesses at Lancaster Business Park, Mellishaw
Lane in Morecambe and Carnforth Business Park;
- improvements to the District's existing employment areas;
- mixed-use developments including offices in and around Lancaster
City Centre;
- consolidating and improving the District's shopping centres;
and
- developing the distinct tourism roles of Morecambe, Lancaster,
Carnforth and the rural area.
|
|
|
|
| 3.1 |
Background - the Local Economy |
| |
Figure 6; Lancaster
District Economically Active Population 1981-2006. |
| |
 |
| |
| 3.1.1 |
Over the last 20 years there has been a fundamental
shift in the economy of Lancaster District from manufacturing to service
employment. By 1994, only 11% of the workforce worked in manufacturing.
The 1980s saw service employment grow by 1000 jobs with the largest
increases occuring in the retail, education, public administration
and miscellaneous service sectors (Figure 7). Public sector organisations
such as health and education providers, Government agencies and privatised
utilities now play an important role. The District's largest individual
employers are Lancaster University, the two NHS hospital trusts and
the nuclear power stations at Heysham. Unemployment has exceeded national
and county averages for some time. |
| 3.1.2 |
New activities, such as paper manufacture, have developed
in the manufacturing sector. There has been major investment in the
Caton Road area, at White Lund and in the Lancaster Canal Corridor
by local companies and by new companies moving into the District. |
| |
|
| |
Figure 7; Lancaster
District Employment Structure, 1981-1993 |
| |
 |
| |
| 3.1.3 |
The local economy is also becoming less self-contained.
During the 1980s, the number of people commuting to work outside the
District grew by 75% to some 6,100 people (Figure 8). The main destinations
are Central Lancashire and South Lakeland. |
| |
|
| |
Figure 8; Commuting
out of the District 1971-1991 |
| |
 |
| |
| |
|
| |
Business Land and Property |
| 3.1.4 |
This Local Plan is required by the Lancashire Structure
Plan to allocate 100 ha of land for business and industrial development
over the Local Plan period. Between 1991 and 1996 around 9 ha of land
was taken up. This leaves a balance of 91 ha. Government Guidance
in PPG4, PPG6 and PPG13 requires Councils to allocate a choice of
sites of different sizes, types and locations and that sites employing
a lot of people should be sited in locations with a choice of means
of transport. |
| 3.1.5 |
Demand for offices and commercial property has helped
to regenerate areas such as White Cross in central Lancaster, where
some 90 companies now employ around 1000 people, and at the adjacent
Moor Lane Mills. Development has also been rapid in the White Lund
Industrial Estate, both by service industries and by car showrooms
and retail wholesalers. |
| |
Figure 9 - Structure
Plan Employment Land Requirements |
| |
| Structure Plan Requirement – 1991-2006 |
100 ha |
| Land developed 1991-1996 |
9 ha |
| Vacant Land available within existing employment areas retained
in District Local Plan 1996 |
50 ha |
| Land allocated on green-field sites in Local Plan |
45.5 ha |
| TOTAL LAND SUPPLY |
95.5 ha |
|
| |
|
| 3.1.6 |
Some former industrial land is unattractive and subject
to some form of contamination. Where there is no possibility of re-use
for employment purposes, the Council will encourage the recycling
of this land for other purposes. The largest single project is the
ongoing establishment of a 100 ha community woodland on the former
Shell-ICI sites in South Heysham. |
| 3.1.7 |
Figure 9 shows the amount of employment land available
in the District in July 1996. This amounts to 50 hectares, whilst
an additional 45.5 ha is proposed in this plan at Bailrigg, Lancaster
Business Park, Mellishaw and Carnforth Business Park. |
|
|
|
| 3.2 |
Business Development Sites |
| |
Diagram 11 - Bailrigg
Business Park |
| |
 |
| |
|
| 3.2.1 |
The Local Plan identifies four prestige green-field
locations for inward investment and high quality development by local
firms. These are vital to attract investment and generate jobs. |
| |
|
| |
Bailrigg Business Park |
| 3.2.2 |
The District must attract new high quality service
industries in the face of local, national and international competition.
The District offers high environmental quality, good external transport
links, cultural facilities, the expertise of Lancaster University
and an exceptional quality of life. It must also offer high quality
business locations in attractive surroundings, close to the M6 and
to Lancaster City Centre. |
| 3.2.3 |
A new business park at Bailrigg, south of Lancaster
is proposed to meet this need. The business park is aimed particularly
at inward investment. It is almost level with an established landscape
structure and a substantial frontage to the A6. It is 5km north of
M6 Junction 33. It is adjacent to Lancaster University and is served
by the Primary Bus Route (see Policy T5) and the Strategic Cycle Network
(see Policy T24). The site lies in a natural hollow and is hidden
by a low mound to the north and by the heavily wooded Lancaster University
Campus to the south. Because of the need to protect the high quality
of the site and prevent development which would detract from it, only
Business (B1) uses are acceptable on the site. |
| 3.2.4 |
Because the site lies in a sensitive location close
to Bailrigg Village and the University Campus, a Development Brief
will be prepared to guide the layout of the site, the form and design
of the buildings and the phasing of development. Development proposals
will be required to include proposals for extensive screening to Bailrigg
village and the A6. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY EC1 |
| |
THE 9.7 HA OF LAND IDENTIFIED ON
THE LOCAL PLAN PROPOSALS MAP AS THE BAILRIGG BUSINESS PARK IS ALLOCATED
FOR B1 (BUSINESS AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) USE ONLY. |
| |
Policy superseded in part by policies within the Core Strategy with effect from 23 July 2008 – both this policy and Core Strategy policies need to be taken into account when proposals are being determined |
| |
|
|
| |
Diagram 12 - Lancaster
Business Park |
| |
 |
| |
|
| |
Lancaster Business Park |
| 3.2.5 |
Lancaster Business Park is an 8 ha green-field site
identified in the Lancaster Local Plan for B1 and B2 use. It is next
to M6 Junction 34 with a long main road frontage. Some non-industrial
uses such as car dealerships, hotels and restaurants may be a necessary
component of a package to bring forward its development. Business
and industrial floorspace must however make up at least 75% of any
mixed-use package. |
| |
|
| |
Mellishaw Lane |
| |
Diagram 13 - The Mellishaw
Area |
| |
 |
| |
|
| 3.2.6 |
Existing local plans allocate 6.5 ha to the north and
14.6 ha to the south of Mellishaw Lane for employment use. Together
these sites form a natural southerly extension of the existing White
Lund Industrial Estate. They are attractive level green-field sites
close to the Morecambe-Heysham By-pass. |
| 3.2.7 |
Some uses such as waste disposal, scrapyards and uses
involving large areas of open storage can detract from sites where
an attractive business environment is essential. Scrapyards and waste
uses are therefore unacceptable on both sites, whilst uses involving
open storage should only be allowed north of Mellishaw Lane subject
to screening to reduce their impact. |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
POLICY EC2 |
| |
THE FOLLOWING SITES IDENTIFIED ON
THE LOCAL PLAN PROPOSALS MAP ARE ALLOCATED FOR THE BUSINESS USE FOR
THE BUSINESS USES SPECIFIED; |
| |
| |
Area (Ha) |
Uses |
| LANCASTER BUSINESS PARK |
8.00 |
B1 B2 |
| MELLISHAW LANE |
20.00 |
B1 B2 B8 |
|
| |
USES INVOLVING EXTENSIVE OPEN STORAGE
WILL NOT BE PERMITTED ON MELLISHAW SOUTH. SUCH USES WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED
ON MELLISHAW NORTH SUBJECT TO SATISFACTORY SCREENING. |
| |
|
| 3.2.8 |
Lancaster Business Park and Mellishaw Lane are major
sites raising complex design, phasing and land-use issues. New or
updated development briefs for these sites will be prepared as required. |
| |
|
| |
Carnforth Business Park |
| |
Diagram 14 - Carnforth
Business Park |
| |
 |
| |
|
| 3.2.9 |
The Carnforth Local Plan (adopted 1989) identified
land at Kellet Road Carnforth as a site for a business park. Phase
1 was developed in the mid 1980s and the park is now Carnforth's most
modern business environment. A further 7.8 ha is identified for general
and light industry. As the site occupies a prominent location on the
edge of the countryside, development proposals must provide substantial
landscaping along the eastern and northern edges of the site and safeguard
the Kellet Road Verges County Biological Heritage Site. |
| 3.2.10 |
The site lies close to houses and schools and is located
on a main route into Carnforth's congested town centre. Uses which
are likely to generate significant heavy goods vehicle movements into
and out of the town centre will not be allowed on the site. As at
Lancaster Business Park and Mellishaw Lane, there is a concern that
waste disposal and scrapyard uses would diminish the attractiveness
of a high quality site of this nature. |
| 3.2.11 |
An approved development brief for this site provides
detailed guidance for potential developers. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY EC3 |
| |
THE 7.8 HA OF LAND IDENTIFIED AS
THE CARNFORTH BUSINESS PARK IS ALLOCATED FOR B1 (BUSINESS AND LIGHT
INDUSTRIAL) AND B2 (GENERAL INDUSTRIAL) USE. |
| |
PROPOSALS FOR USES WHICH COULD RESULT
IN SIGNIFICANT INCREASES IN HGV MOVEMENTS INTO OR OUT OF CARNFORTH
TOWN CENTRE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED ON THIS SITE. |
| |
|
| |
Other Rural Employment Locations |
| 3.2.12 |
Employment land and a positive attitude to employment
development in the countryside is essential to the rural economy.
This is illustrated by the success of Rural Development Commission
(now Countryside Agency) investment in workshops in Hornby and Caton
and private business developments in Carnforth, Cowan Bridge, Burrow,
Halton and Galgate. Such developments will continue to be supported.
Development will normally be directed to identified rural settlements.
Exceptionally, appropriate development may be allowed adjacent to
or outside villages if it meets a clear local need. |
| |
|
| |
Willow Mill, Caton |
| 3.2.13 |
The converted Willow Mill and adjacent farm buildings
to the south are the main employment area within Caton and Brookhouse
containing many small businesses. The site is close to residential
property and the impact of new uses will be carefully considered. |
| |
|
| |
Claughton Buffer Store |
| 3.2.14 |
There is an established concentration of industrial
activity at Claughton. The site consists of a brickworks, a garden
centre and a large former buffer store previously used for the storage
of agricultural produce. The area is directly accessed from the A683
and does not directly adjoin residential property. Although not within
a rural settlement, the site lies on the main Lune Valley bus route.
The site also adjoins a football pitch which should be protected from
development. The site lies within the Forest of Bowland Area of Outstanding
Natural Beauty and development must therefore be of a high standard
(see Policy E3). |
| |
|
| |
Hornby Industrial Estate |
| 3.2.15 |
The small industrial estate at Hornby has successfully
attracted a number of small businesses to the village. The estate
is close to residential properties on Caton Road. Any development
on the estate must carefully consider impacts on these properties.
This site is also within the Forest of Bowland Area of Outstanding
Natural Beauty and the landscape impact of development proposals will
be closely examined (see Policy E3). |
| |
|
| |
Cowan Bridge Industrial Estate |
| 3.2.16 |
The development of a small industrial estate in Cowan
Bridge has brought significant employment benefits to the upper Lune
Valley. The site adjoins the A65 trunk road. Development here must
pay close attention to its road frontage. |
| |
|
| |
Glasson Dock |
| 3.2.17 |
In addition to the Port of Glasson discussed under
Policy EC11, the Glasson Industrial Area is a major rural employment
site anchored by a large silencer manufacturer. Future development
here will need to safeguard the Fishnet point yacht club. Development
must not harm the Lune Estuary Site of Special Scientific Interest
(See Policies E15 and E16). HGV movements and the impact of development
on adjoining residential areas will also be important issues. |
| |
|
| |
Galgate Silk Mill |
| 3.2.18 |
The former silk mill at Galgate has been successfully
converted for use by a number of small businesses. Access improvements
have been brought about by the development of the adjoining housing
site (See Policy H5). The main issues here are likely to be the impact
of development on adjoining residents and the impact of traffic on
Church Lane. |
| |
|
| |
Halton Mills |
| 3.2.19 |
Halton Mills is an important rural employment site.
The special issues affecting this site are considered under Policy
EC7. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY EC4 |
| |
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT AND THE CONVERSION
OF BUILDINGS TO EMPLOYMENT USE WILL BE PERMITTED ON THE FOLLOWING
RURAL EMPLOYMENT SITES IDENTIFIED ON THE LOCAL PLAN PROPOSALS MAP; |
| |
WILLOW MILL, CATON
CLAUGHTON BRICKWORKS AND BUFFER STORE
HORNBY INDUSTRIAL ESTATE
COWAN BRIDGE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE
GLASSON DOCK
GLASSON INDUSTRIAL AREA
GALGATE SILK MILL |
| |
AND ON OTHER EXISTING EMPLOYMENT
SITES WITHIN OR ON THE EDGE OF THE RURAL SETTLEMENTS IDENTIFIED IN
POLICY H7, WHERE THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT; |
| |
|
IS APPROPRIATE TO ITS SURROUNDINGS
IN TERMS OF SITING, SCALE, DESIGN, MATERIALS, EXTERNAL APPEARANCE
AND LANDSCAPING; AND |
| |
|
WOULD NOT RESULT IN A SIGNIFICANT
ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE AMENITIES OF NEIGHBOURING RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES
BY REASON OF NOISE, VIBRATION, SOOT, ASH, GRIT, VISUAL INTRUSION,
LIGHT, TRAFFIC GENERATION OR PARKING; AND |
| |
|
MAKES SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR
ACCESS, SERVICING, CYCLE AND CAR PARKING AND |
| |
|
MAKES SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR
THE DISPOSAL OF SEWAGE AND WASTEWATER; AND |
| |
|
DOES NOT GENERATE UNACCEPTABLE LEVELS
OR TYPES OF TRAFFIC ON RURAL ROADS; AND |
| |
|
DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE
EFFECT ON NATURE CONSERVATION INTERESTS; |
| |
PARTICULAR ATTENTION WILL BE PAID
TO THE APPEARANCE AND IMPACTS OF EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT AFFECTING
THE FOREST OF BOWLAND AND ARNSIDE/SILVERDALE AREAS OF OUTSTANDING
NATURAL BEAUTY. |
| |
|
| 3.2.20 |
Note; The conversion of existing buildings in the countryside
is considered in Policy E20. |
|
|
|
| 3.3 |
Improving the District's Existing
Employment Areas |
| |
3.3.1 The sites identified in Policies EC1 and EC2 provide
locations for large single users, offices and users which require
high quality surroundings. The needs of small businesses and the expansion
needs of existing businesses must also be met. Vacant sites and premises
within the existing industrial areas at South Heysham, White Lund,
Caton Road, Luneside, Carnforth and Halton can help to meet this need.
The turnover of businesses in these areas also provides a supply of
sites and premises. |
| |
|
| |
White Cross, Lancaster |
| 3.3.2 |
White Cross is the result of a major conversion and
new build regeneration initiative in the 1980s. It comprises mills
converted to offices, new industrial units, a canalside public house,
a television studio and a Further Education College. White Cross is
close to Lancaster City Centre and is adjoined by dense residential
areas. It is therefore unsuitable for B8 uses which generate a lot
of lorry movements. |
| |
|
| |
Caton Road, Lancaster |
| 3.3.3 |
The area between Caton Road and the River Lune is one
of Lancaster's most successful employment areas. At the south end,
the Ladies Walk Industrial Estate provides a range of small business
premises. The central section is a former mill, now used largely for
storage and distribution. The Lansil industrial estate has been reclaimed
from a former mill site by Lancaster City Council and is now fully
developed with the development of a major new paper mill and agricultural
feedmill. The area is close to the M6 and is suitable for most types
of business and industrial use. |
| |
|
| |
Luneside |
| 3.3.4 |
The special problems of the Luneside area are considered
in Policy EC14. The area has a substantial stock of vacant land but
is constrained by access difficulties and potential contamination. |
| |
|
| |
White Lund |
| 3.3.5 |
The White Lund Industrial Estate, between Lancaster
and Morecambe, is the District's largest employment area covering
89 ha and employing more than 5000 people. In addition to being the
location for many important local businesses, the estate has become
the District's centre for car showrooms. Around 3.9 ha of land remains
undeveloped. White Lund is suitable for most industrial uses. The
special problems of the Whitegate area are discussed later in this
chapter. |
| |
|
| |
Royd Mill, Heysham |
| 3.3.6 |
This small site lies on the Morecambe-Heysham By-pass
and currently fully occupied. It is suitable for most types of industrial
use. |
| |
|
| |
Major Industrial Estate and Heysham
Industrial Estate |
| 3.3.7 |
These sites are part of the former Shell oil refinery
which covered much of south Heysham. The special problems of the south
Heysham area are considered later in the plan. The Major Estate is
currently fully occupied by a chemical reclamation plant, a builder's
yard and a number of small businesses. The Heysham estate contains
3.2 ha of vacant land and a number of vacant premises. A new waste
water treatment plant has recently been completed on this site. The
sites are suitable for most industrial uses. Particular care should
be taken where development adjoins Middleton Wood (see Policy E26). |
| |
|
| |
Lancaster West Business Park |
| 3.3.8 |
The former ICI Nitrates Plant is the District's largest
area of vacant industrial land. Although partly in use for storage,
it contains 15.2 ha of vacant land and premises. Completion of the
Morecambe and Heysham By-Pass has opened up the possibility of a new
direct access to the site using an old rail alignment. The site is
part of the complex of sites in south Heysham and development should
make a positive contribution to the implementation of the Middleton
Wood proposal (see Policy E26). The site is suitable for most industrial
uses. |
| |
|
| |
The Port of Heysham |
| 3.3.9 |
The special issues related to the Port of Heysham are
covered by Policy EC10. The 2.4 ha of vacant land is safeguarded for
port related industry. |
| |
|
| |
Port of Heysham Industrial Estate |
| 3.3.10 |
The Port of Heysham Industrial Estate was reclaimed
in the early 1980s. Some vacant plots remain and land to the rear
is reserved for future expansion. The estate is suitable for most
business and industrial uses not involving extensive open storage.
Development on the vacant land identified will need to be screened
from nearby residential areas. |
| |
|
| |
Heysham Power Stations |
| 3.3.11 |
Some 12.3 ha of land at Heysham Power Stations is held
by Nuclear Electric in support of its existing power station development
and for possible future industrial use. A feasibility study is currently
being carried out for the Company into the suitability of the land
for B1, B2 or B8 use. |
| |
|
| |
Warton Road, Carnforth |
| 3.3.12 |
The area between Warton Road and the West Coast Main
Line in Carnforth is currently used as a haulage and distribution
operation. Further employment development in this area will be considered
principally in terms of its effect on HGV movements in Market Street. |
| |
|
| |
Lodge Quarry, Carnforth |
| 3.3.13 |
Also known as Carnforth Trading Estate, this site contains
a number of small businesses and business premises. It is however
close to residential properties. The central location of the site
means that it is not suitable for B8 uses which generate a lot of
lorry traffic. |
| |
|
| |
Scotland Road, Carnforth |
| 3.3.14 |
This site is currently used for the manufacture and
storage of concrete products. Whilst it currently suffers from an
inadequate access onto the A6, it can be reached from the M6 without
passing though the centre and is therefore suitable for B8 uses. The
site adjoins a residential area on its southern side and lies immediately
adjacent to Carnforth Town Centre. |
| |
|
| |
Kellet Road, Carnforth |
| 3.3.15 |
The new business allocation at The Carnforth Business
Park is considered under Policy EC3. The existing industrial estate
is also constrained by the need to restrict uses which increase lorry
movements through the Town and B8 uses are not appropriate. |
| |
|
| |
Millhead |
| 3.3.16 |
The Millhead industrial area adjoins open countryside.
The area between the industrial estate and the River Keer is urban
greenspace and should not be developed. The area is also very close
to houses at Millhead. The site is unsuitable for B8 uses because
of its unsatisfactory access and the fact that such uses could increase
traffic movements through Carnforth Town Centre. |
| |
|
| |
Carnforth Levels |
| 3.3.17 |
These sites, on the northern edge of Carnforth, are
close to the M6, remote from residential areas and suitable for most
types of industrial use. As they adjoin the countryside area, frontage
treatments will require particular care. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY EC5 |
| |
THE FOLLOWING SITES SHOWN ON THE
LOCAL PLAN PROPOSALS MAP ARE ALLOCATED FOR THE BUSINESS USES SPECIFIED
SUBJECT TO POLICIES EC9, EC10 AND EC13. |
| |
| USES |
Total Ha |
Vacant Ha |
| LANCASTER |
|
|
| WHITE CROSS B1,B2 |
6.3 |
0 |
| CATON ROAD B1,B2,B8 |
39 |
0 |
| LUNESIDE B1,B2 |
29.7 |
6.4 |
| WHITE LUND B1,B2,B8 |
88.9 |
3.9 |
| |
|
|
| HEYSHAM |
|
|
| ROYD MILL 2.2 0 B1,B2,B8 |
|
|
| MAJOR IND. EST. B1,B2,B8 |
8.2 |
0 |
| HEYSHAM IND. EST B1,B2,B8 |
19.3 |
3.2 |
| LANCASTER WEST B1,B2,B8 |
18.8 |
15.2 |
| PORT OF HEYSHAM B1,B2,B8 |
33.5 |
2.4 |
| PORT IND. EST. B1,B2,B8 |
11.0 |
5.1 |
| POWER STATIONS B1,B2,B8 |
56.8 |
12.23 |
| |
|
|
| CARNFORTH |
|
|
| WARTON ROAD B1,B2,B8 |
8.5 |
0 |
| LODGE QUARRY B1,B2 |
2.6 |
0 |
| SCOTLAND ROAD B1,B2,B8 |
3.0 |
0 |
| KELLET ROAD B1,B2,B8 |
2.0 |
0 |
| MILLHEADB1,B2 |
2.2 |
0 |
| CARNFORTH LEVELSB1,B2,B8 |
2.6 |
0 |
| |
|
|
| TOTAL |
|
50 ha |
|
| |
|
| |
Criteria for new Employment Development |
| 3.3.18 |
New employment development must maintain or improve
the quality of the business environment and cannot be allowed to worsen
local environmental conditions. Safeguards are also required to ensure
that adjoining land-uses are not adversely affected by employment
related activity. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY EC6 |
| |
IN LANCASTER, MORECAMBE, HEYSHAM
AND CARNFORTH, NEW EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT WILL BE PERMITTED WHICH; |
| |
|
MAKES SATISFACTORY PROVISION FOR
ACCESS, SERVICING, CYCLE AND CAR PARKING; |
| |
|
IS EASILY ACCESSIBLE TO PEDESTRIANS
AND CYCLISTS FROM SURROUNDING STREETS, PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY, BUS STOPS
AND RAIL STATIONS; |
| |
|
IS APPROPRIATE TO ITS SURROUNDINGS
IN TERMS OF SITING, SCALE, DESIGN AND EXTERNAL APPEARANCE; |
| |
|
USES HIGH QUALITY FACING MATERIALS
AND LANDSCAPING TREATMENT TO FRONTAGES VISIBLE FROM ROADS AND OTHER
PUBLIC PLACES; |
| |
|
PROVIDES FOR THE SCREENING OF SERVICING
AND OPEN STORAGE AREAS FROM PUBLIC FRONTAGES AND FROM ADJOINING COUNTRYSIDE; |
| |
|
MAKES SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR
THE DISPOSAL OF SEWAGE AND WASTEWATER AND DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT
ADVERSE EFFECT ON WATER QUALITY; |
| |
|
DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE
IMPACT ON THE AMENITIES OF RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES BY REASON OF NOISE,
SMELL, GRIT, VISUAL INTRUSION, LIGHT, TRAFFIC GENERATION OR PARKING;
AND |
| |
|
UPGRADES ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
WHERE THESE ARE UNSATISFACTORY. |
| |
PROPOSALS FOR MAJOR EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY GREEN TRANSPORT PLANS IN ACCORDANCE WITH POLICY
T17 |
| |
|
| |
Local Issues |
| |
Halton Mills, Employment Opportunity
Site |
| 3.3.19 |
Halton Mills is an old industrial area on the banks
of the River Lune containing a mixture of Victorian mill buildings
and cleared sites and more recent industrial premises. Part of the
site, the former Great Lakes chemical works is believed to be seriously
contaminated. The only access to the site, along Mill Lane is narrow
and poorly surfaced whilst all approaches to the site are along constrained
local roads unsuitable for heavy goods vehicles. |
| 3.3.20 |
The site has a substantial river frontage and is crossed
by a public footpath linking Halton, the Lancaster-Caton Cycle Track
and the Crook o' Lune beauty spot. The eastern end of the site adjoins
the Forest of Bowland Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. The site
also forms part of the River Lune Millennium Park. The River Lune
and the woods forming its banks are County Biological Heritage Sites. |
| 3.3.21 |
Despite the difficulties set out above, the site is
one of the most important employment sites in the rural area and employment
should remain the dominant use. In view of the constraints set out
above and the recreational and landscape importance of the site, a
comprehensive employment based mixed-use development including limited
supporting development, which clearly addresses the problems of the
whole site, is essential. Development proposals will only be acceptable
which sustain the importance of the site as an employment area. |
| 3.3.22 |
Detailed criteria for employment development in the
rural area are set out in Policy EC4 and development proposals for
Halton Mills should satisfy these. |
| |
|
| |
Diagram 15 - Halton
Mills |
| |
 |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY EC7 |
| |
LAND IDENTIFIED ON THE PROPOSALS
MAP AT HALTON MILLS IS ALLOCATED AS A RURAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
SITE. PROPOSALS FOR COMPREHENSIVE EMPLOYMENT BASED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT
INCLUDING HOUSING AND INFORMAL RECREATIONAL USES WILL BE PERMITTED
WHERE THE PROPOSAL; |
| |
|
CONFINES DEVELOPMENT TO THE AREA
SHOWN ON THE LOCAL PLAN PROPOSALS MAP; |
| |
|
PROVIDES FOR AN EXPANSION OF BUSINESS
ACTIVITY ON THE SITE; |
| |
|
WILL REMOVE ALL PROBLEMS OF DERELICTION
AND CONTAMINATION FROM THE SITE; AND |
| |
|
WILL RESULT IN A MIX OF DEVELOPMENT
IN WHICH EMPLOYMENT IS THE DOMINANT USE. |
| |
EXCEPTIONALLY THE COUNCIL WILL CONSIDER
LIMITED EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT BEYOND THE CONFINES OF THE EXISTING
DEVELOPMENT AREA PROVIDED; |
| |
|
THIS IS ESSENTIAL TO THE RETENTION
OR EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING EMPLOYER; |
| |
|
THE PROPOSAL WOULD CONTRIBUTE TO
THE RESOLUTION OF THE ACCESS PROBLEMS OF THE SITE; |
| |
|
THE PROPOSALS WOULD RESULT IN A NET
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT OVER THE WHOLE SITE. |
| |
|
| |
Non-Employment Development in Employment
Areas |
| 3.3.23 |
The District's employment areas must be safeguarded
from inappropriate development. Retail and leisure development within
employment areas can reduce the potential of an area for employment
development, both directly in terms of land lost, and indirectly through
subsequent limitations on industrial uses on adjacent sites. New retail
development is, in any event, directed to town centres (see Policy
S1 and S3) whilst large scale commercial leisure development is essential
to the regeneration of central Morecambe (see Policy TO1). Functioning
industrial areas are rarely capable of providing a satisfactory residential
environment. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY EC8 |
| |
PROPOSALS TO SITE NON-INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING RETAIL, COMMERCIAL LEISURE AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
ON LAND IDENTIFIED FOR BUSINESS AND INDUSTRIAL USE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED |
| |
Policy Not Saved with effect from 27 September 2007 |
| |
|
|
| |
South Heysham |
| 3.3.24 |
There are substantial areas of vacant land in the south
Heysham area. This area continues to be upgraded with new woodland
with the aim of providing a recreational resource and a better environment
for the remaining industrial area (see Policy E26). |
| 3.3.25 |
To achieve this upgrading, it is necessary to control
the further introduction of uses which could detract from the environmental
quality of the area. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY EC9 |
| |
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS WHICH WOULD
RESULT IN A WORSENING OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS IN SOUTH HEYSHAM
WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. |
| |
Policy Not Saved with effect from 27 September 2007 |
| |
|
|
| |
The Port of Heysham |
| 3.3.26 |
The Port of Heysham is one of the most important ports
on the Irish Sea and is a major economic asset. It is an important
link between the UK and Ireland and is a potential component of the
EC Trans European Route Network. It is the terminal for passenger
services to the Isle of Man and freight services to Ireland. The Port
also houses an onshore supply base for the Morecambe Bay Gas Field
and has attracted some port related industry. Although facing increasing
competition, port business is growing and it is therefore important
that land adjacent to the port is safeguarded for port expansion.
Morecambe Bay is a nature conservation site of international importance.
Policies E15 and E16 address nature conservation issues. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY EC10 |
| |
WITHIN THE PORT OF HEYSHAM AREA IDENTIFIED
ON THE PROPOSALS MAP, EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED
WHERE IT REQUIRES A COASTAL LOCATION |
| |
|
|
| |
Glasson Dock |
| 3.3.27 |
Glasson Dock is a small but important port which is
located close to residential areas. The Port's development needs must
be balanced against the impact of port related activities on local
residents. Some dock activities, such as the open storage of coal
and animal feeds and the loading and unloading of goods at unsocial
hours can cause disturbance, noise, dust and smell. |
| 3.3.28 |
Most port related activity within the established estate
does not require planning permission. Where proposals do fall within
planning control which are likely to generate an adverse impact on
nearby homes it is essential that mitigation measures to minimise
their impact on residents are provided. |
| |
THE COUNCIL WILL WORK WITH THE PORT COMMISSIONERS
TO REDUCE THE IMPACT OF EXISTING PORT ACTIVITY ON NEIGHBOURING RESIDENTS
AND BUSINESSES. THE COUNCIL WILL ALSO MAKE USE OF ITS POWERS UNDER
THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT TO REGULATE PORT ACTIVITY |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY EC11 |
| |
WITHIN THE GLASSON AND GLASSON DOCK
INDUSTRIAL AREAS IDENTIFIED ON THE PROPOSALS MAP, DEVELOPMENT WILL
ONLY BE PERMITTED WHERE IT DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE EFFECT
ON RESIDENTIAL AMENITY IN TERMS OF NOISE, SMELL, VIBRATION, SMOKE,
SOOT, ASH, GRIT, DUST, LIGHT VISUAL INTRUSION, TRAFFIC GENERATION
OR PARKING. |
| |
ADDITIONALLY WITHIN GLASSON DOCK,
DEVELOPMENT WILL BE PERMITTED ONLY WHERE IT CAN BE ESTABLISHED THAT
IT REQUIRES A COASTAL LOCATION. |
| |
|
|
| |
Nightingale Hall Farm |
| 3.3.29 |
The animal by-products rendering plant at Nightingale
Hall Farm has expanded in recent years allied with the installation
of more sophisticated odour control and suppression measures. The
plant was identified as a 'bad neighbour' use in the Lancaster Local
Plan and has, over the years, been the subject of complaints from
local residents over the impact of smell and heavy goods vehicle movements
on their amenity. The plant is also close to several schools and well-used
public amenity areas such as Williamson Park. Whilst the number of
complaints has reduced in recent years, the Council remains concerned
over the potential for further problems if the abatement system controlling
odours is not managed correctly. |
| 3.3.30 |
The plant operates under an authorisation granted under
the Environmental Protection Act 1990 and its day-to-day operation
is regulated by the Chief Environmental Health Officer. However, because
of the potential for adverse impact on amenity, the Council considers
it appropriate to establish additional safeguards. The Council will
not therefore permit development which would result in either an adverse
impact on residential or public amenity particularly by reason of
smell or increased HGV movements though residential areas. |
| 3.3.31 |
Nightingale Hall Farm's location on the prominent eastern
side of Lancaster, close to Williamson Park (a Conservation Area and
a Historic Park and Garden) and the listed Ashton Memorial, means
that any development which would have an adverse impact on the hillside
location or the character of the surrounding area must be carefully
controlled. In determining any such proposal, the Council will take
into account the benefits of any operational improvements and balance
these against any visual impact. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY EC12 |
| |
WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THE AREA IDENTIFIED
AS NIGHTINGALE HALL FARM ON THE LOCAL PLAN PROPOSALS MAP, PLANNING
PERMISSION FOR DEVELOPMENT WILL NOT BE GRANTED UNLESS IT WILL RESULT
IN; |
| |
|
NO ADVERSE IMPACT ON AMENITY BY REASON
OF SMELL; AND |
| |
|
NO INCREASE IN HGV MOVEMENTS TO AND
FROM THE SITE AND THROUGH RESIDENTIAL AREAS IN PARTICULAR; AND |
| |
|
NO UNACCEPTABLE IMPACT ON THE SITE,
ITS SURROUNDINGS AND THE WIDER LANDSCAPE. |
| |
Policy Not Saved with effect from 27 September 2007 |
| |
|
|
| 3.3.32 |
Nightingale Hall Farm's close proximity to a residential
area, schools, parks and playing fields and poor road links to the
motorway, means that it occupies a location which is not ideal for
its current use. Whilst complaints of smell have reduced, there is
still the potential for problems to arise and the impact of HGV traffic
remains. For these reasons, the Council remains committed, working
with the plant's owner, to achieving the relocation of the animal
by-products rendering plant to a more acceptable site. |
| 3.3.33 |
In considering any proposal to relocate Nightingale
Hall Farm the Council will take into account the location of the proposed
site in relation to protected areas, links to the national transport
network, potential impact on amenity and any adverse effect on landscape
or settlement character or the setting of a listed building. |
| 3.3.34 |
Any relocation proposal will also have to address the
future of the existing site in terms of the use to which it will ultimately
be put and a timetable for the transfer of the rendering operation.
The Council will require a scheme covering the cessation of the rendering
operation to be agreed before construction commences on the replacement
plant. This scheme must address the treatment of any potential on-site
contamination, the removal of traffic problems associated with the
existing operation and the appearance of the site. The Council will
seek to negotiate a section 106 planning agreement which will guarantee
a cessation of the rendering operation within an agreed timescale. |
| 3.3.35 |
To assist the future relocation of Nightingale Hall
Farm, the plant and some surrounding land is identified as a Housing
Opportunity Site under policy H3. Whilst housing is considered to
be a particularly suitable use for the site, this allocation does
not preclude other appropriate uses. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY EC13 |
| |
THE CITY COUNCIL WILL WORK WITH THE
SITE OWNERS TO ACHIEVE THE RELOCATION OF THE ANIMAL BY-PRODUCTS RENDERING
PLANT AT NIGHTINGALE HALL FARM TO A MORE ACCEPTABLE SITE. |
| |
PLANNING PERMISSION FOR AN ANIMAL
BY-PRODUCTS RENDERING PLANT TO REPLACE THAT AT NIGHTINGALE HALL FARM
WILL ONLY BE GRANTED WHERE; |
| |
|
THE SITE LIES OUTSIDE ANY AREA OF
OUTSTANDING NATURAL BEAUTY, SITE OF NATURE CONSERVATION IMPORTANCE,
CONSERVATION AREA, GREEN BELT OR SCHEDULED ANCIENT MONUMENT, AND; |
| |
|
THE SITE CAN BE SATISFACTORILY LINKED
TO THE NATIONAL TRANSPORT NETWORK WITHOUT GENERATING HGV TRAFFIC THROUGH
RESIDENTIAL AREAS, AND; |
| |
|
THE PROPOSAL DOES NOT HAVE AN ADVERSE
IMPACT ON AMENITY BY REASON OF SMELL, NOISE, LIGHT AND TRAFFIC GENERATION,
AND; |
| |
|
THE PROPOSAL DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT
ADVERSE EFFECT ON LANDSCAPE OR SETTLEMENT CHARACTER OR ON THE SETTING
OF A LISTED BUILDING. |
| |
NO WORK ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF A
REPLACEMENT PLANT SHALL COMMENCE UNTIL A SCHEME FOR THE ENVIRONMENTALLY
ACCEPTABLE REUSE OF THE NIGHTINGALE HALL FARM SITE AND A PROGRAMME
FOR THE TRANSFER OF THE ANIMAL BY-PRODUCTS RENDERING PLANT TO A NEW
SITE HAS BEEN AGREED WITH THE LOCAL PLANNING AUTHORITY. |
| |
Policy Not Saved with effect from 27 September 2007 |
| |
|
| |
Diagram 16 - Luneside |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Luneside |
| 3.3.36 |
The Luneside area contains 7.9 ha of vacant land and
is in need of major upgrading. The area remains an important industrial
location with some of the District's main manufacturing employers
and many small businesses. Existing allocations for industrial and
business development are retained. |
| 3.3.37 |
Access to Luneside will continue to be via residential
roads. This limits business developments which generate HGV movements.
Further haulage, construction and warehousing uses will not therefore
normally be permitted. |
| 3.3.38 |
Part of the Luneside area adjoins the Lune Riverside
Park (see Policies E30 and R9). The open land to the south and west
containing woodland and open space uses is not required for industrial
use. This area is identified as a woodland opportunity area under
Policy E27. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY EC14 |
| |
WITHIN THE LUNESIDE AREA IDENTIFIED
ON THE PROPOSALS MAP, DEVELOPMENT BRINGING NEW BUSINESSES WHICH WOULD
RESULT IN AN OVERALL INCREASE IN HGV MOVEMENTS WILL NOT BE PERMITTED.
PROPOSALS TO EXPAND OR INTENSIFY EXISTING USES WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED
WHERE THEY ARE ACCOMPANIED BY AN AGREED SCHEME OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENTS
AND MEASURES TO MINIMISE THE IMPACT OF TRAFFIC MOVEMENTS ON NEARBY
STREETS. |
| |
Policy superseded in part by policies within the Core Strategy with effect from 23 July 2008 – both this policy and Core Strategy policies need to be taken into account when proposals are being determined |
| |
|
|
| |
Environmental Improvements |
| 3.3.39 |
The Luneside area and the western end of the White
Lund Industrial Estate around Whitegate suffer from poor environmental
quality, circuitous access and a low standard of building, servicing
and storage facilities. Significant improvements to both areas are
needed including the upgrading and renewal of access roads, environmental
improvements and the screening of open storage and scrapyard uses. |
| |
THE COUNCIL WILL PREPARE A STRATEGY FOR THE UPGRADING
AND ENHANCEMENT OF THE WHITEGATE AND LUNESIDE AREAS INCLUDING ENVIRONMENTAL
AND ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS |
| |
|
| |
Business and Industrial Development
Outside Employment Areas |
| 3.3.40 |
Whilst most employment development will take place
on identified sites, some service uses can satisfactorily be located
in residential areas or within town centres. Some businesses located
outside employment areas may also need to expand. Mixed-use developments
are encouraged and appropriate employment development outside employment
areas will be allowed where compatable with other policies of the
Local Plan. |
| 3.3.41 |
Where proposals for employment use are located close
to houses, residential amenity will be the primary consideration.
Where a proposal is acceptable in its own right but changes of use
within the same use class could be unacceptable, the Council will
limit planning permissions to the specific use applied for. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY EC15 |
| |
IN LANCASTER, MORECAMBE, HEYSHAM
AND CARNFORTH, PROPOSALS FOR B1 (BUSINESS AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) USES
WILL BE PERMITTED OUTSIDE ESTABLISHED EMPLOYMENT AREAS PROVIDED THAT; |
| |
|
IN LANCASTER, MORECAMBE, HEYSHAM
AND CARNFORTH, PROPOSALS FOR B1 (BUSINESS AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) USES
WILL BE PERMITTED OUTSIDE ESTABLISHED EMPLOYMENT AREAS PROVIDED THAT; |
| |
|
THERE WILL BE NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
ON THE AMENITIES OF ADJOINING RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES. |
| |
EXCEPTIONALLY B2 (GENERAL INDUSTRIAL)
USES WILL BE PERMITTED PROVIDED THAT THE ABOVE CRITERIA ARE MET. IN
SUCH CASES THE COUNCIL WILL ATTACH A CONDITION LIMITING THE PERMISSION
SPECIFICALLY TO THE USE APPLIED FOR. |
| |
Policy Not Saved with effect from 27 September 2007 |
| |
|
| |
Non-Employment Development on Rural
Employment Sites |
| 3.3.42 |
In the rural areas, demand for small affordable business
premises has been demonstrated by the success of business developments
in Caton, Hornby and Cowan Bridge. Jobs in villages are essential
to the survival of vulnerable rural communities. Opportunities for
land and premises are limited by the need to protect the countryside
and by having to compete with housing development for a very limited
supply of sites. Existing employment sites in villages are therefore
a very important resource. Their potential contribution to the rural
economy must be taken into account when assessing proposals for their
use. |
| 3.3.43 |
Proposals for non-employment uses on rural employment
sites will only be permitted where it can be demonstrated that committed
attempts have been made to market the site for employment purposes.
Evidence will be required that the site has been advertised for sale
on the open market in the appropriate local and trade press at a realistic
price or rent on more than two occasions over a period of at least
one year and that no reasonable offers have been refused. |
| 3.3.44 |
Some rural employment uses can give rise to serious
environmental problems through visual intrusiveness, noise and heavy
goods vehicle movements on unsuitable roads. There will be instances
where the benefits of removing an unsatisfactory use will be substantial
and other uses may be considered. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY EC16 |
| |
PROPOSALS FOR NON-EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
ON THE FOLLOWING RURAL EMPLOYMENT SITES WILL NOT BE PERMITTED: |
| |
WILLOW MILL, CATON
CLAUGHTON BRICKWORKS AND BUFFER STORE
HORNBY INDUSTRIAL ESTATE
COWAN BRIDGE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE
GLASSON INDUSTRIAL AREA
GLASSON DOCK
GALGATE SILK MILL |
| |
ELSEWHERE IN THE RURAL AREA, DEVELOPMENT
WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED WHERE IT CAN BE SHOWN THAT THERE IS NO DEMAND
FOR EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT; OR |
| |
|
THE SITE'S LOCATION OR SURROUNDINGS
ARE CLEARLY UNSUITED TO EMPLOYMENT USE; AND |
| |
|
AND THE PROPOSAL WOULD BRING ABOUT
CLEAR ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS; OR |
| |
|
THE PROPOSAL IS PART OF A MIXED-USE
SCHEME IN WHICH EMPLOYMENT IS THE DOMINANT USE. |
|
|
|
| 3.4 |
The Office Sector |
| |
Office Development |
| 3.4.1 |
There has been significant recent in office development
in the District. Two companies (Reebok and Prospero) have established
major office centres in the District. The largely office-based White
Cross scheme, which began in 1983, is now approaching capacity. Both
White Cross and Mitre House contain large public sector users. |
| 3.4.2 |
There is scope for further office-based service industry
development in the District. This may be met at the proposed Bailrigg
Business Park (see Policy EC1) and through the re-use of existing
sites and buildings in and on the edge of the District's town centres
where users can benefit from the concentration of activities and facilities
and good public transport links. |
| 3.4.3 |
There may be opportunities for mixed-use conversions
with an office element at the redundant hospital site at Lancaster
Moor North (see Policy H3) where there are substantial buildings with
the scope to provide new offices in high quality buildings and surroundings. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY EC17 |
| |
WITHIN THE DISTRICT'S SHOPPING CENTRES,
PROPOSALS FOR OFFICE (B1) USES INCLUDING THE CHANGE OF USE OF EXISTING
BUILDINGS WILL BE PERMITTED WHERE THEY ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE RETAIL
POLICIES OF THE LOCAL PLAN. |
| |
THE FOLLOWING SITES SHOWN ON THE
PROPOSALS MAP ARE IDENTIFIED AS BUSINESS OPPPORTUNITY SITES; |
| |
KINGSWAY
DAMSIDE
LANCASTER MOOR HOSPITAL |
| |
WITHIN THESE SITES, THE COUNCIL WILL
PERMIT OFFICE DEVELOPMENT AS PART OF A MIXED-USE SCHEME |
| |
|
| |
Kingsway Site, Lancaster |
| 3.4.4 |
This site lies at the busiest approach to Lancaster
City Centre at the Lune bridges. It presents visitors from the north
with their first impression of the City. There are three Listed Buildings
on the site, the 18th Century Bridge End House - an attractive former
tollhouse for Skerton Bridge, which is currently unused, Kingsway
Baths and Bus Garage - a large 1930s municipal structure and an ornate
former marble works currently in use as a restaurant. The recent closure
of Kingsway baths has created an opportunity to develop comprehensive
proposals to provide; |
| |
- better road links from Caton Road to the City Centre car parks;
- a more impressive entrance to the historic city of Lancaster;
- a permanent use for Bridge End House;
- the safeguarding of the listed former Marble Works and its setting;
- the retention of as much of the important elements of Kingsway
Baths and Bus Garage as is practicable;
- A 300 space 'Park and Walk/Ride' car park;
- better footpath links across the site and;
- attractive development sites for business and commercial development;
|
| 3.4.5 |
It is important to ensure that the comprehensive approach
to the development of the area and the opportunity to transform this
important gateway to the City Centre is not lost. |
| 3.4.6 |
The site lies outside Lancaster City Centre. Any retail
floorspace proposed must satisfy Policy S2. It must not exceed the
existing retail floorspace on the site. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY EC18 |
| |
PROPOSALS FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE MIXED-USE
DEVELOPMENT OF THE KINGSWAY BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY SITE FOR BUSINESS
AND LIGHT INDUSTRY, RETAIL, LEISURE AND RESIDENTIAL USES, WILL BE
PERMITTED WHERE; |
| |
|
PROVISION IS MADE FOR A 300 SPACE
PARK AND WALK/RIDE CAR PARK AS PART OF THE SCHEME; |
| |
|
THE PROPOSALS DO NOT PREJUDICE THE
PROPOSED LANCASTER CITY CENTRE HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS; AND |
| |
|
ANY RETAIL FLOORSPACE PROPOSED SHOULD
SATISFY THE TESTS SET OUT IN POLICY S2 |
| |
| |
|
| |
Diagram 17 - Kingsway |
| |
 |
|
|
|
| 3.5 |
Maintaining and Enhancing the
District's Shopping Centres |
| |
The District's Retail
Hierarchy |
| 3.5.1 |
The retail sector is one of the most important elements
in the Local Economy. It is estimated that there are around 800 retail
businesses in the District adding up to around 96,000 sq. m of retail
floorspace and employing around 4000 people. |
| |
|
| |
Figure 10 - Comparison
Shopping in Lancaster and Morecambe (1998) |
| |
| |
Lancaster Centre |
Morecambe Centre |
| Number of Shops (A1,A2,A3) |
383 |
196 |
| Total Shopping Floorspace (ground floor
gross) |
66,847 |
46,150 |
| Number of National Comparison Multiple Shops |
76 |
27 |
| National Comparison Floorspace (sq.m gross) |
35,031 |
10,228 |
| Number of Clothing and Footwear shops |
58 |
27 |
| Clothing and Footwear Floorspace (sq.m gross) |
15,221 |
7205 |
|
| |
|
| 3.5.2 |
The District's retail hierarchy elaborates on the hierarchy
set out in the Lancashire Structure Plan which identifies Lancaster
and Morecambe town centres as preferred locations for new retail development.
The hierarchy consists of; |
| |
- Lancaster City Centre; a major sub-regional shopping centre
and the principal location for new retail development;
- Morecambe Town Centre; an important convenience and local comparison
centre;
- Carnforth; the convenience, local comparison and service centre
for the north of the District; and
- local convenience centres at Torrisholme, Caton, Bare, Morecambe
West End, Heysham Road Heysham and Bolton-le-Sands.
|
| 3.5.3 |
Four supermarkets form the basis of convenience shopping
in the District. A Sainsbury store lies on the edge of Lancaster City
Centre. Morecambe Town Centre contains a Morrisons and a small Tesco.
Carnforth Town Centre contains a Booths. There is also an out-of-centre
Asda at Ovangle Road, a Netto on Lancaster Road and an Aldi on Morecambe
Road, all between Lancaster and Morecambe. |
| 3.5.4 |
Other retail outlets in the District are the Lancaster
City Retail Park, an out-of-centre retail park selling DIY goods and
furniture on Mellishaw Lane, Morecambe, a small edge-of-centre retail
park on Bulk Road, north of Lancaster City Centre and freestanding
out-of-centre DIY stores on Aldcliffe Road, Lancaster and White Lund
Road, Morecambe. |
| 3.5.5 |
The shopping hierarchy identifies the town centres
to be protected and enhanced. It ensures that as many services as
possible are provided locally, that high order services are provided
at the most public transport accessible locations and that local services
are accessible on foot. New development should be located in the centres
identified and should be appropriate to the size and catchment area
of the centre concerned. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY S1 |
| |
NEW SHOPPING DEVELOPMENT, OTHER THAN
SMALL LOCAL SHOPS, VILLAGE SHOPS, FARM SHOPS AND SHOPPING DEVELOPMENT
WHICH SATISFIES THE REQUIREMENTS OF POLICY S2, WILL BE PERMITTED ONLY
WITHIN THE CITY, DISTRICT AND LOCAL CENTRES IDENTIFIED ON THE LOCAL
PLAN PROPOSALS MAP. |
| |
SUB-REGIONAL
CENTRE
LANCASTER |
| |
DISTRICT
CENTRES
MORECAMBE
CARNFORTH |
| |
LOCAL
CENTRES
MORECAMBE, WEST END
TORRISHOLME
BARE
HEYSHAM ROAD
CATON VILLAGE
BOLTON-LE-SANDS |
| |
WITHIN THESE CENTRES PROPOSALS FOR
RETAIL DEVELOPMENT WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED WHICH ARE APPROPRIATE TO
THE SIZE AND FUNCTION OF THE CENTRE CONCERNED |
| |
Policy superseded in part by policies within the Core Strategy with effect from 23 July 2008 – both this policy and Core Strategy policies need to be taken into account when proposals are being determined |
| |
|
| |
Retail Development
on the Edge of or Outside Identified Centres |
| 3.5.6 |
The Council's primary objective is to retain the overall
vitality and viability of the centres identified in the hierarchy.
It will apply the sequential test to all proposals for new retail
development. This means that proposals for retail development in edge
of centre locations will only be approved where all of the following
tests are satisfied; |
| |
- need can be demonstrated;
- need cannot be met on sites on or within premises within existing
centres;
- the site is within reasonable walking distance of an existing
centre;
|
| 3.5.7 |
Out of centre development, i.e. development which lies
outside reasonable walking distance of the centre, will only be permitted
where there are no town centre or edge-of-centre options. In the very
exceptional circumstances when and out-of-centre proposal may be acceptable,
it must be well related to public transport and to existing and proposed
residential areas. |
| 3.5.8 |
In considering edge and out-of-centre retail schemes,
the Council will have regard to the possibility of accommodating demonstrated
need on more than one site and, in considering bulky goods proposals,
the extent to which the type of goods to be sold could also be sold
in town centre shops. Where out-of-centre and edge-of-centre retailing
is permitted, it will only be in locations with good public transport
links to its potential catchment area. Out and edge of centre permissions
will be limited to ranges of goods which can be shown not to have
a significant adverse effect on the overall vitality of a city, district
or local centre. |
| 3.5.9 |
Local shopping development is defined as that which,
because of its size, potential turnover and range of goods sold, may
be expected to draw most of its custom from residents of the area
within 5 minutes walking distance of the development. Village shops
which serve an extensive, sparsely populated, rural catchment area
are clearly an exception. Rural shopping is considered in Policies
S16-S18. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY S2 |
| |
EXCEPTIONALLY, WHERE THERE IS CLEAR
EVIDENCE OF NEED SUPPORTED BY A RETAIL IMPACT STATEMENT, PROPOSALS
FOR NEW RETAIL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE PERMITTED IN EDGE-OF-CENTRE LOCATIONS
WHERE; |
| |
1. |
THE SITE IS WITHIN REASONABLE WALKING
DISTANCE OF THE BOUNDARY OF AN EXISTING CENTRE; AND |
| |
2. |
THE NEED IDENTIFIED CANNOT BE MET
WITHIN AN EXISTING CENTRE; AND |
| |
3. |
THE PROPOSAL IS SERVED BY PUBLIC
TRANSPORT; AND |
| |
4. |
THE SITE IS LINKED TO THE CENTRE
BY A SAFE, DIRECT PEDESTRIAN ROUTE; AND |
| |
5. |
THE PROPOSAL, BY REASON OF ITS SIZE,
LOCATION, RANGE OF GOODS SOLD, PROJECTED TURNOVER AND POTENTIAL CATCHMENT
AREA CAN BE SHOWN TO HAVE NO SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE VIABILITY
AND VITALITY OF A CENTRE IDENTIFIED IN POLICY S1 OR A TOWN OR DISTRICT
CENTRE OUTSIDE THE DISTRICT |
| |
VERY EXCEPTIONALLY, OUT OF CENTRE
SHOPPING DEVELOPMENT WILL BE PERMITTED WHERE THE IDENTIFIED NEED CANNOT
BE MET EITHER IN EXISTING CENTRES OR IN SUITABLE EDGE OF CENTRE LOCATIONS
AND WHERE CRITERIA 2,3 AND 5 ARE MET. |
| |
Policy wholly superseded by policies within the Core Strategy with effect from 23 July 2008 |
| |
|
| |
Diagram 18 - Lancaster
City Centre |
| |
 |
| |
|
| |
Lancaster City Centre Strategy |
| 3.5.10 |
Lancaster is Lancashire's third largest centre after
Preston and Blackpool. It has a large catchment including all of Lancaster
District and parts of Wyre, Craven and South Lakeland District. Lancaster
must maintain and develop a role as a prosperous, successful, sub-regional
shopping centre providing high-quality shops and services to north
Lancashire and south Cumbria. |
| 3.5.11 |
Lancaster has recently seen the development of the
Marketgate Centre, the major refurbishment of St Nicholas Arcades,
refurbishments and extensions to Marks and Spencer, BHS and WH Smith,
the development of the edge of centre retail park at Bulk Road and
the out-of-centre Lancaster City Retail Park. The pedestrianisation
of Upper Penny Street, improvements in Church Street, the promotion
of quality shopfronts and the control of non-A1 retail uses have resulted
in significant improvements. |
| 3.5.12 |
Vacancy rates in Lancaster have fallen significantly
over the past two years as units in the Marketgate Centre have been
taken up and major relocations have been absorbed. There is some evidence
to suggest that there will be some capacity for new comparison retailing
in Lancaster during the plan period. At the same time, caution is
needed to ensure that the current compact, pedestrian friendly retail
core is not undermined by excessive retail development outside the
City Centre. Concerns remain about the high level of secondary retailing
activity such as charity and discount shops in primary frontages.
There may also be scope for some new convenience retailing in Lancaster. |
| 3.5.13 |
Lancaster competes with other centres. It must retain
its existing customer base, increase market share within its existing
catchment area and win back customers in areas where it has lost trade
in the past. |
| 3.5.14 |
To achieve this, Lancaster must build on its strengths.
These are; |
| |
- a historic city with exceptional environmental quality and
a good range of high street and specialist shops;
- a largely traffic free shopping environment;
- a compact city centre with most facilities within easy and pleasant
walking distance of each other;
- a town centre which is perceived as safe;
- an easily understood layout with many attractive landmark buildings;
- a city centre that has seen high levels of investment in the
recent past;
- a location which is accessible from a wide area.
|
| 3.5.15 |
At the same time, action needs to be taken to combat
the disincentives to shop in Lancaster including a perceived shortage
of car parking, access difficulties and a smaller range of shops in
certain goods types than some of its competitors. |
| 3.5.16 |
The strategy therefore has the following main elements; |
| |
- the upgrading of Lancaster Bus Station;
- the pedestrianisation of Church Street;
- the provision of better pedestrian links between the bus station
and the City Centre;
- the reduction of primary vacancy to 5% and secondary vacancy
to 10%;
- the mixed-use development of the Brewery site for retail, residential
and commercial use;
- the mixed-use development of the Dalton Square/Penny Street
site;
- the management of town centre car parking to provide more short-stay
parking for shoppers;
- provision of the Kingsway Park and Walk site;
- Better provision for cyclists through the Council's Cycling
Strategy.
|
| |
New City Centre Development |
| 3.5.17 |
To allow the City Centre to consolidate and adjust,
a cautious approach to new retail development is needed. There is
enough vacant floorspace to absorb most expenditure growth. There
may be some scope for some town centre convenience floorspace in Lancaster
and limited new comparison floorspace after 2001. The Council has
identified three sites suitable for retail development. |
| |
|
| |
The Brewery Site |
| 3.5.18 |
The Brewery site, between Market Street and Church
Street, is a small backland site which could create pedestrian links
between Church Street, Market Street, Market Square and Cheapside.
Mixed-use development of this site could incorporate a small arcade
or small high quality town centre foodstore. Housing, offices and
other town centre uses could form part of a mixed-use package. |
| |
|
| |
Dalton Square/Penny Street |
| 3.5.19 |
The chain of sites between Dalton Square and Penny
Street could be a new entrance to the shopping centre from the east.
It links Dalton Square and the canalside car parks with the main clothes
shopping street of Penny Street and the Marketgate Shopping Centre.
The comprehensive mixed-use development of these sites, sensitively
designed to protect important buildings, could incorporate new retail
development. |
| |
|
| |
King Street |
| 3.5.20 |
A large area off King Street was previously identified
as a site for a large single store. Changing pressures on the City
Centre and new government guidance allow the consideration of residential
or mixed-use schemes. Development must enhance this important gateway
to the City Centre. This site is also identified as a Housing Opportunity
Site under Policy H3. |
| 3.5.21 |
The complex and sensitive nature of these sites may
require development to be guided by development briefs covering design
and acceptable uses. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY S3 |
| |
THE FOLLOWING SITES ARE IDENTIFIED
ON THE LOCAL PLAN PROPOSALS MAP AS CITY CENTRE DEVELOPMENT SITES FOR
COMPREHENSIVE MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATING RETAIL, RESIDENTIAL,
BUSINESS AND OTHER APPROPRIATE TOWN CENTRE USES; |
| |
BREWERY, DALTON SQUARE/
PENNY STREET, KING STREET |
| |
NEW RETAIL DEVELOPMENT IN LANCASTER
CITY CENTRE WILL BE DIRECTED TO THESE SITES. |
| |
Policy Not Saved with effect from 27 September 2007 |
| |
|
| 3.5.22 |
The Lancaster Local Plan also identified a large site
at Damside for major retail development. This would include Lancaster
Bus Station and the car parks in the vicinity. There is currently
no likelihood of such a development being achievable. There is also
concern that such development on this scale could harm the City Centre.
This site is no longer considered appropriate as a City Centre Development
Site. |
| |
|
| |
Lancaster City Centre -Primary Shopping
Frontages |
| 3.5.23 |
Lancaster's primary shopping area consists of the northern
end of Penny Street, the eastern end of Market Street, Cheapside,
the St Nicholas Centre and the Marketgate Centre. This area contains
most of the City's national comparison multiples, its biggest in-centre
stores, its highest rents, its major shopping centres and its highest
pedestrian flows. It is the retail core of Lancaster and its continued
vitality is essential to the District's economy. Whilst the diversity
of the centre is one of its strengths, restraint must be exercised
over A2 (financial and professional services) and A3 (food and drink)
uses to ensure that A1 retail remains the dominant ground floor use.
The Council will concentrate environmental improvements within this
area to ensure that the centre continues to provide a competitive
shopping environment. |
| 3.5.24 |
The main approaches to the retail core are identified
as other key retail frontages. These are predominantly pedestrianised
streets housing many of the District's small specialist shops, restaurants,
public houses and cafes. Lower pedestrian flows allow for the development
of street life, cafes with outside seating, market stalls etc. The
pedestrianisation of Church Street will assist this process and increase
the importance of connecting streets between the primary retail area
and the new bus station. Within these areas, the Council wishes to
maintain uses which contribute to the vitality and viability of the
frontages. A1 retail must remain an important element but the introduction
of high quality food and drink uses will contribute to the vitality
of the area. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY S4 |
| |
THE FOLLOWING FRONTAGES ARE IDENTIFIED
AS PRIMARY RETAIL FRONTAGES WITHIN WHICH A1 RETAIL WILL REMAIN THE
DOMINANT USE; |
| |
CHEAPSIDE (ALL FRONTAGES),
ST NICHOLAS CENTRE (ALL FRONTAGES),
MARKETGATE CENTRE (ALL FRONTAGES)
1-33 AND 2-36 MARKET STREET
1-43 AND 2-32 PENNY STREET |
| |
THE FOLLOWING FRONTAGES ARE IDENTIFIED
AS OTHER KEY RETAIL FRONTAGES WITHIN WHICH A1 RETAIL AND A3 (FOOD
AND DRINK) USES WHICH SATISFY THE CRITERIA SET OUT IN POLICY S7 WILL
REMAIN THE DOMINANT USES; |
| |
BROCK ST (ALL FRONTAGES)
1-35, COMMON GARDEN ST
42-88 AND 53-99, PENNY ST
SIR SIMON'S ARCADE (ALL FRONTAGES),
FRANCES' PASSAGE (ALL FRONTAGES),
GAGE ST (ALL FRONTAGES),
11-21 DALTON SQUARE
1-15 AND 2-8 NORTH ROAD,
25 47 CHINA STREET,
35-83 AND 38-99, MARKET ST
NEW ST (ALL FRONTAGES)
1-59 AND 2-70, CHURCH ST
63 81 AND 46-60 NORTH RD,
1-5 AND 2-14 DAMSIDE ST,
1-11 AND 2-6 CHAPEL ST. |
| |
Lancaster City Centre - Financial and
Professional Service Uses |
| 3.5.25 |
Financial and professional services are a major element
of the economy of Lancaster City Centre and, in moderate numbers,
contribute to the diversity of uses within the centre. Most of the
City's estate agents are located in New Street and the west end of
Market Street. A number of banks and financial services are located
at the west end of Church Street. There is a further concentration
of office and professional services in the Dalton Square area. |
| 3.5.26 |
In the City's Primary Retail Frontages, within which
most major retailers are located and which experience the highest
pedestrian flows, there is a real danger that where such uses become
over dominant, the vitality, interest and attractiveness of the street
is diminished. These concerns also exist, but to a lesser degree,
in Other Key Frontages. There are also special considerations in the
Castle Precinct area and these are considered in Policy E40. |
| 3.5.27 |
The Council therefore takes a fourfold approach as
follows; |
| |
- Encouraging the development of financial and professional services
in the established office quarters of upper Church Street/Sun
Street and Dalton Square, in marginal and peripheral shopping
areas, and in upper floors elsewhere within the City Centre;
- Allowing for A2 uses within the City Centre Development Sites
and the Employment Opportunity Site at Damside Street;
- Allowing up to 20% of ground floor frontages to be in A2 use
within Other Key Retail Frontages; and
- Making reasonable provision within Primary Retail Frontages
whilst ensuring that A1 retail remains the dominant use.
|
|
|
|
| |
POLICY S5 |
| |
WITHIN THE PRIMARY RETAIL FRONTAGES
IN LANCASTER CITY CENTRE IDENTIFIED ON THE PROPOSALS MAP, THE CHANGE
OF USE OF GROUND FLOOR PREMISES TO A2 (FINANCIAL AND PROFESSIONAL
SERVICE) USES WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED WHERE; |
| |
|
ALL ADJOINING FRONTAGES ARE IN A1
RETAIL USE; AND |
| |
|
THE PROPOSAL WOULD NOT RESULT IN
THE PROPORTION OF NON A1 USES EXCEEDING 20% OF ANY CONTINUOUS RETAIL
FRONTAGE. |
| |
WITHIN OTHER KEY FRONTAGES IDENTIFIED
ON THE LOCAL PLAN PROPOSALS MAP, SUCH USES WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED
WHERE; |
| |
|
AN ADJOINING BUILDINGS IS IN A1 RETAIL
USE, AND |
| |
|
THE PROPORTION OF ANY CONTINUOUS
RETAIL FRONTAGE LENGTH IN A2 USE WOULD NOT EXCEED 20% |
| |
| |
|
| |
Lancaster City Centre -Amusement Related
Uses |
| 3.5.28 |
Amusement centres have become established features
of almost all town centres. A centre has recently opened on Cheapside.
Amusement centres are wholly inappropriate in the Castle Conservation
Area. Elsewhere in the City Centre, there may be limited scope for
such centres outside Primary Retail Frontages. In dealing with applications
for amusement centres, particular attention will be paid to the appearance
of the street scene, the effect on shopping frontages and the amenities
of nearby residents and businesses. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY S6 |
| |
AMUSEMENT CENTRES AND OTHER AMUSEMENT
RELATED USES WILL NOT BE PERMITTED WITHIN THE CASTLE CONSERVATION
AREA. ELSEWHERE IN GROUND FLOOR PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY CENTRE,
SUCH USES WILL BE PERMITTED OUTSIDE PRIMARY RETAIL FRONTAGES WHERE
THEY DO NOT; |
| |
|
HARM THE CHARACTER AND APPEARANCE
OF THE STREET SCENE OR HISTORIC BUILDINGS; |
| |
|
COMPROMISE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY ON A
MAJOR TRAFFIC ROUTE; |
| |
|
ADJOIN A SIMILAR USE OR BREAK UP
A CONTINUOUS RETAIL FRONTAGE; AND |
| |
|
HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE EFFECT
ON THE AMENITIES OF NEIGHBOURING RESIDENTS OR BUSINESSES. |
| |
EXCEPTIONALLY SUCH USES MAY BE PERMITTED
WITHIN PRIMARY RETAIL FRONTAGES WHERE THEY ARE OF A SCALE AND DESIGN
APPROPRIATE TO A PRIMARY SHOPPING LOCATION AND DO NOT PREJUDICE THE
VITALITY AND VIABILITY OF THE CITY CENTRE |
| |
|
| |
Lancaster City Centre - Food and Drink
Uses |
| 3.5.29 |
Restaurants, cafes, public houses and hot food takeaways
are essential elements of the City Centre economy. They contribute
to its diversity, its employment base and its vitality and viability.
They are particularly valuable in maintaining the vitality of the
centre outside normal shopping hours. There are concentrations of
pubs and restaurants in the Church Street area and in Upper Penny
Street. Pedestrianisations in these areas will increase the scope
for pavement seating and consolidate their roles as eating and drinking
areas. Within these 'Cafe Quarters' the Council will give priority
to proposals for cafes and restaurants which open during the day,
which will have an attractive frontage and which allow pavement seating. |
| 3.5.30 |
Some types of A3 use, particularly hot food takeaways
and public houses can give rise to problems of noise, smell and antisocial
behaviour if over concentrated or unsuitably located. The introduction
of CCTV in Lancaster City Centre is helping to combat this. The Council
will resist proposals for public houses and takeaways where such concentrations
would threaten city centre vitality or residential amenity. |
| 3.5.31 |
The Council's approach to A3 uses is the following; |
| |
- Encouraging the development of 'cafe and restaurant quarters'
in pedestrianised Other Key Frontage streets, where these would
contribute to the vitality of the centre and giving particular
encouragement to proposals incorporating outdoor seating.
- Making provision for a reasonable proportion of A3 uses within
primary retail frontages.
- Resisting excessive concentrations of, or unsuitably located
public houses and hot food takeaways where these would give rise
to amenity problems or have a harmful effect on City Centre vitality.
|
|
|
|
| |
POLICY S7 |
| |
WITHIN THE PRIMARY RETAIL FRONTAGES
IN LANCASTER CITY CENTRE IDENTIFIED ON THE PROPOSALS MAP, THE CHANGE
OF USE OF GROUND FLOOR PREMISES TO A3 (FOOD AND DRINK) USES WILL ONLY
BE PERMITTED WHERE; |
| |
|
AN ADJOINING FRONTAGE IS IN A1 RETAIL
USE; AND |
| |
|
THE PROPOSAL WOULD NOT RESULT IN
THE PROPORTION OF A3 (FOOD AND DRINK) OF ANY CONTINUOUS RETAIL FRONTAGE
LENGTH EXCEEDING 20%, AND |
| |
|
THE PROPOSAL DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT
ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE CHARACTER OF THE STREET OR THE AMENITIES OF
NEIGHBOURING RESIDENTS OR BUSINESSES; |
| |
WITHIN OTHER KEY RETAIL FRONTAGES
IDENTIFIED ON THE LOCAL PLAN PROPOSALS MAP, SUCH USES WILL ONLY BE
PERMITTED WHERE |
| |
|
AN ADJOINING FRONTAGE IS IN A1 RETAIL
USE; AND |
| |
|
THE PROPOSAL DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT
ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE CHARACTER OF THE STREET OR THE AMENITIES OF
NEIGHBOURING RESIDENTS OR BUSINESSES. |
| |
|
| |
Morecambe Town Centre |
| |
Diagram 19 - Morecambe
Town Centre |
 |
| |
|
| 3.5.32 |
Morecambe Town Centre is a district shopping centre
providing mainly convenience goods to Morecambe, Heysham and nearby
villages. The town has recently seen the development of a new Morrisons
superstore and the relocation of its market to a new market hall on
Central Drive. Although larger than Lancaster in area, Morecambe has
fewer shops and a smaller catchment population. It is also very dispersed
with many vacant shops. |
| 3.5.33 |
The centre has three main elements. There is a core
of town centre shops focused around the Arndale Centre. There is also
a range of gift shops, amusement arcades and catering outlets along
Marine Drive serving visitors. The third element is the new development
in the Central Drive area. |
| 3.5.34 |
The new development and stock of vacant shops can absorb
demand for new floorspace over the local plan period. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY S8 |
| |
WITHIN MORECAMBE TOWN CENTRE, PROPOSALS
FOR NEW RETAIL DEVELOPMENT WHICH ARE CONSISTENT WITH POLICY S1 AND
WOULD IMPROVE THE RANGE AND QUALITY OF SHOPS IN MORECAMBE WILL BE
PERMITTED. |
| |
ELSEWHERE IN MORECAMBE, WHERE THERE
ARE SIGNIFICANT CONCENTRATIONS OF VACANT SHOPS, PROPOSALS TO CONVERT
SHOPS TO RESIDENTIAL USE WILL BE PERMITTED WHERE THE LOSS OF RETAIL
PROPERTY WOULD NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE VIABILITY
OF A CENTRE IDENTIFIED IN POLICY S1. |
| |
Policy Not Saved with effect from 27 September 2007 |
| |
|
| |
Morecambe Town Centre - Non-A1 Retail
Uses |
| 3.5.35 |
Morecambe's central shopping area needs to be safeguarded
against the incursion of restaurant and café uses which are better
located on the seafront. Morecambe's seaside character and its well
defined existing areas justify a different policy approach to that
operated in Lancaster. Over-concentration of financial and professional
service uses should also be avoided. Outside the main shopping centre,
and in the Poulton Action Area in particular, the conversion of shops
to non-retail uses could help to consolidate the town centre (See
Policy H23). |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY S9 |
| |
IN GROUND FLOOR PROPERTIES IDENTIFIED
AS PROTECTED RETAIL FRONTAGES IN MORECAMBE TOWN CENTRE, A2 (FINANCIAL
AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES) AND A3 (FOOD AND DRINK) USES WILL BE PERMITTED
WHERE; |
| |
|
THE ADJOINING FRONTAGES ARE IN A1
RETAIL USE; AND |
| |
|
THE PROPOSAL WOULD NOT RESULT IN
THE PROPORTION OF NON-A1 RETAIL USE OF ANY CONTINUOUS RETAIL FRONTAGE
LENGTH EXCEEDING 20%, AND |
| |
|
THE PROPOSAL DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT
ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE AMENITIES OF NEIGHBOURING RESIDENTS OR BUSINESSES; |
| |
|
| |
Amusement Centres |
| 3.5.36 |
Amusement centres and arcades are part of the seaside
'scene' and, in moderate numbers, contribute to the colour and variety
of the seafront. If over-concentrated, however, they become intrusive.
They can also cause noise and visual disturbance particularly in residential
areas. In the Town Centre, amusement uses may detract from the shopping
environment. Amusement arcades are inappropriate in the modern leisure
environment created in the Central Promenade Area and are directed
to older parts of the seafront. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY S10 |
| |
AMUSEMENT RELATED USES WILL NOT BE
PERMITTED IN GROUND FLOOR PROPERTIES ON MARINE RD BETWEEN NORTHUMBERLAND
ST AND FRONTIERLAND. ELSEWHERE IN GROUND FLOOR PROPERTIES WITHIN MORECAMBE
TOWN CENTRE, SUCH USES WILL BE PERMITTED OUTSIDE PROTECTED RETAIL
FRONTAGES WHERE THEY DO NOT; |
| |
HARM THE CHARACTER AND APPEARANCE
OF THE STREET-SCENE OR HISTORIC BUILDINGS; |
| |
COMPROMISE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY ON A
MAJOR TRAFFIC ROUTE; |
| |
ADJOIN A SIMILAR USE OR BREAK UP
A CONTINUOUS RETAIL FRONTAGE AND |
| |
HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE EFFECT
ON THE AMENITIES OF NEIGHBOURING RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES. |
| |
|
|
| |
Carnforth Town Centre |
| 3.5.37 |
Carnforth is a small but important shopping centre
providing convenience and local comparison goods to the north of the
District and adjoining parts of south Cumbria. The centre has around
5000 sq. m net of retail floorspace in 46 units focused on Market
Street. The Booths supermarket has reinforced Carnforth with modern
town-centre shopping with parking. It has enabled the centre to withstand
competition from food superstores in Lancaster, Kendal and Morecambe. |
| 3.5.38 |
Despite recent planning applications for retail development,
large scale increases in floorspace, particularly out-of-town could
cause significant harm to the town centre. No provision has therefore
been made to expand its shopping area. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY S11 |
| |
WITHIN CARNFORTH TOWN CENTRE, PROPOSALS
FOR NEW RETAIL DEVELOPMENT WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH POLICY S1 AND
WOULD IMPROVE CARNFORTH'S ROLE AS A DISTRICT CENTRE WILL BE PERMITTED |
| |
Policy Not Saved with effect from 27 September 2007 |
| |
|
|
| 3.5.39 |
The unrestricted development of financial service uses
and food and drink uses in Market Street could have a harmful effect
on what is currently a successful and diverse shopping street. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY S12 |
| |
IN GROUND FLOOR PROPERTIES IDENTIFIED
AS PROTECTED RETAIL FRONTAGES IN CARNFORTH TOWN CENTRE, A2 (FINANCIAL
AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES) AND A3 (FOOD AND DRINK) USES WILL BE PERMITTED
WHERE; |
| |
AN ADJOINING FRONTAGE IS IN A1 RETAIL
USE; AND |
| |
THE PROPOSAL WOULD NOT RESULT IN
THE PROPORTION OF NON-A1 RETAIL USE OF ANY CONTINUOUS RETAIL FRONTAGE
LENGTH EXCEEDING 20%, AND |
| |
THE PROPOSAL DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT
ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE AMENITIES OF NEIGHBOURING RESIDENTS OR BUSINESSES; |
| |
|
| |
Morecambe West End Local Centre |
| 3.5.40 |
The large area of shops in the West End of Morecambe
has developed a local convenience role. This has been reinforced by
the Morecambe Single Regeneration Budget Programme. Vacancy, low investment
and poor quality shops are prevalent in the West End. The centre is
spread over a large area and lacks an obvious focus. It does however
retain distinctive traditional architecture which contributes to its
character. |
| 3.5.41 |
Most of the surviving shops are on Yorkshire Street,
Claremont Road and Albert Road. A short section of seafront uses link
Albert Road with Frontierland. A compact, focused West End shopping
centre could provide convenience goods and local services whilst continuing
to offer interest to visitors. The change of use of peripheral shop
units to residential or community use will be encouraged. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY S13 |
| |
IN GROUND FLOOR PROPERTIES IDENTIFIED
AS PROTECTED RETAIL FRONTAGES IN THE MORECAMBE WEST END LOCAL CENTRE,
A2 (FINANCIAL AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES) AND A3 (FOOD AND DRINK) USES
WILL BE PERMITTED WHERE; |
| |
|
THE PROPOSAL WOULD NOT RESULT IN
THE PROPORTION OF NON-A1 RETAIL USE OF ANY CONTINUOUS RETAIL FRONTAGE
LENGTH EXCEEDING 20%, AND |
| |
|
THE PROPOSAL DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT
ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE AMENITIES OF NEIGHBOURING RESIDENTS OR BUSINESSES; |
| |
ELSEWHERE WITHIN THE CENTRE, THE
CONVERSION OF SHOPS TO RESIDENTIAL, BUSINESS AND COMMUNITY USE WILL
BE PERMITTED |
| |
Policy Not Saved with effect from 27 September 2007 |
| |
|
| |
Local Centres |
| 3.5.42 |
The District's local centres provide top-up convenience
retailing and local services within walking distance of many homes.
Development which could harm the vitality and viability of these centres
will be resisted. Wherever practicable, the Council will introduce
environment and highway safety improvements. |
| 3.5.43 |
The Council will, in consultation with the highway
authority, public transport operators and local residents, develop
Environmental Improvement Strategies for the local centres identified.
These may include traffic calming, improvements to the pedestrian
environment and other environmental improvements. |
| |
|
| |
Torrisholme Local Centre |
| 3.5.44 |
Torrisholme is a small local convenience centre between
Lancaster and Morecambe centred around the former village core of
Torrisholme. It is anchored by a Booths supermarket and by a sizeable
Spar shop. It offers all basic convenience functions. The primary
bus corridor runs along its main street. It has an attractive curvilinear
form, a focus in the former village green and a number of buildings
of character. |
| 3.5.45 |
To protect and enhance Torrisholme, the impact of traffic
must be lessened. It lies on a main route between Lancaster and Morecambe.
Narrow pavements in places and a curving road limit opportunities
for pedestrian crossings and bus stops. The pavement linking Booths
with the rest of the centre is particularly narrow. Some pavements
are in need of renewal and expanses of tarmac in front of some shops
may provide opportunities for environmental improvements. |
| |
|
| |
Prince's Crescent Local Centre, Bare |
| 3.5.46 |
Prince's Crescent in Bare is an attractive small shopping
centre of 32 shops in north Morecambe. It is an unspoilt Victorian
shopping parade with spacious pavements and mature trees. Its main
shops are concentrated at the southern end of the parade and there
are few vacant units. It lies on a main bus route. |
| 3.5.47 |
Like many local centres, it suffers from under-investment.
Some shops require maintenance and upgrading and there is a small
cluster of vacant units on the corner of Princes Crescent and Bare
Lane. The centre is anchored by a Spar shop and there is no off-street
car-parking. |
| |
|
| |
Heysham Road, Heysham |
| 3.5.48 |
Heysham Road is the only sizeable local centre for
the Heysham area. It contains 17 shops, a garage and a public house
and is located on the Primary Bus Corridor. The Morecambe and Heysham
By-Pass has reduced the impact of traffic and left a wide road with
on-street parking on both sides. It remains dominated by the main
road and has a severe street environment with no trees. |
| |
|
| |
Caton Local Centre |
| 3.5.49 |
Caton is a small but important centre providing convenience
shopping and other facilities to the Lune Valley area. It has a Co-op
Late Shop, two banks, a post office, two public houses, a petrol station,
a newsagent and a public library. The small shopping parade on Sycamore
Drive is also an important facility. The busy A683 separates the shops
and other facilities from most of the residential areas of Caton and
from the main car park. |
| |
|
| |
Bolton-le-Sands |
| 3.5.50 |
Bolton-le-Sands is the District's largest village.
Its shops and key facilities are located in the village core and most
lie within the Bolton-le-Sands Conservation Area. The Centre contains
most key shops, two pubs and a library. The centre is well served
by public transport and is close to the Lancaster Canal. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY S14 |
| |
WITHIN THE FOLLOWING LOCAL CENTRES
SHOWN ON THE PROPOSALS MAP, SMALL-SCALE RETAIL DEVELOPMENT SERVING
A STRICTLY LOCAL CATCHMENT WILL BE PERMITTED SUBJECT TO OTHER POLICIES
IN THE LOCAL PLAN; |
| |
MORECAMBE WEST END
TORRISHOLME
PRINCE'S CRESCENT, BARE
HEYSHAM ROAD, HEYSHAM
CATON
BOLTON-LE-SANDS |
| |
WITHIN THESE AREAS, THE COUNCIL WILL
PREPARE AND IMPLEMENT PROPOSALS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENTS AND
TRAFFIC CALMING WHERE APPROPRIATE. |
| |
Policy Not Saved with effect from 27 September 2007 |
| |
|
| |
Small Local Shops |
| 3.5.51 |
Small shopping parades and convenience shops in urban
areas such as Scotforth Road, Bowerham Road, Greaves and Heysham Village
provide valuable top up convenience shopping that people can walk
to. Small shops within large new housing developments can also perform
this role as well as providing a focus and adding variety. |
| 3.5.52 |
The loss of such shops can increase dependence on the
car and cause inconvenience to those without access to a car. Decisions
on the future of local shops may be affected by the expectation of
a residential after use. In some areas however, there are many redundant
shops which have a poor appearance and little likelihood of viable
use. Here conversion to housing may improve the quality of the local
environment. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY S15 |
| |
IN LANCASTER, MORECAMBE AND CARNFORTH,
PROPOSALS FOR SMALL SHOPS AND SHOPPING PARADES WILL BE PERMITTED WHERE
THEY HAVE A STRICTLY LOCAL CATCHMENT AND DO NOT HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT
ON THE OVERALL VITALITY AND VIABILITY OF EXISTING SHOPPING CENTRES; |
| |
THE CONVERSION OF LOCAL SHOPS TO
NON A1 RETAIL USE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED UNLESS; |
| |
|
EQUIVALENT PROVISION WITHIN REASONABLE
WALKING DISTANCE EXISTS, OR FORMS PART OF THE PROPOSAL; OR |
| |
|
IT CAN BE DEMONSTRATED THAT THE SHOP
IS NO LONGER VIABLE AND CONVERSION WOULD HAVE CLEAR ENVIRONMENTAL
BENEFITS. |
| |
|
| |
Villages |
| 3.5.53 |
Village shops provide essential services to those without
access to a car and give a focus to small rural communities. The importance
of rural shopping has recently been reinforced with the publication
of the Rural White Paper and revised PPG7. Small shops in villages
will normally be encouraged. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY S16 |
| |
WITHIN RURAL SETTLEMENTS, PROPOSALS
FOR NEW VILLAGE SHOPS WILL BE PERMITTED WHERE THEY DO NOT HARM THE
OVERALL VITALITY AND VIABILITY OF EXISTING SHOPPING CENTRES. |
| |
Policy Not Saved with effect from 27 September 2007 |
| |
|
|
| |
Farm Shops |
| 3.5.54 |
Farm shops selling their own produce are an important
part of many agricultural businesses. They can contribute to the management
of change and the retention of a vibrant rural economy which is a
key aim of the Local Plan. Policy E21 deals more generally with proposals
for agricultural diversification. The small-scale sale of a farm's
own produce does not normally require permission. This includes operations
such as 'Pick Your Own' fruit and small-scale sales of milk, eggs,
potatoes etc. Whilst farm shops should be founded on selling the produce
of the farm unit, the seasonal nature of agriculture means that in
order to secure year round opening and provide permanent employment,
farm shops may need to sell other produce at certain times. It may
also be appropriate for farm shops to sell the produce of neighbouring
farms. |
| 3.5.55 |
The countryside is not an appropriate location for
general retail activity because of trade diversion from vulnerable
village shops, and because of its visual impacts, traffic generated,
impact on travel patterns and associated signage. These concerns are
particularly acute within the District's two Areas of Outstanding
Natural Beauty. Making use of existing farm buildings helps to minimise
the visual impact of any proposed shop. Proposals for farm shops will
be closely examined to make sure that these impacts are minimised.
Farm shops will only therefore be permitted where they are clearly
related to an agricultural enterprise. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY S17 |
| |
FARM SHOPS WILL BE PERMITTED WHERE; |
| |
|
THE PROPOSED SHOP MAKES A POSITIVE
CONTRIBUTION TO THE VIABILITY OF THE FARM HOLDING AND REMAINS SUBSIDIARY
TO THE MAIN FARMING ENTERPRISE; |
| |
|
THE GOODS SOLD ARE PREDOMINANTLY
GROWN OR PRODUCED WITHIN THE FARM UNIT OR WITHIN OTHER FARMS IN THE
LOCALITY; AND |
| |
|
THE PROPOSAL WOULD NOT BY REASON
OF ITS SCALE, POTENTIAL TURNOVER OR RANGE OF GOODS SOLD, HAVE A SIGNIFICANT
ADVERSE IMPACT ON NEARBY VILLAGE SHOPPING; AND |
| |
|
THE PROPOSAL, AND ANY SIGNAGE ASSOCIATED
WITH IT, WOULD NOT HAVE AN ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE CHARACTER OF THE
AREA OR LEAD TO AN UNACCEPTABLE INCREASE IN TRAFFIC; AND |
| |
|
THE PROPOSAL MAKES SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS
FOR ACCESS, SERVICING, CYCLE, AND CAR PARKING; AND |
| |
|
THE SHOP USES EXISTING BUILDINGS
WITHIN THE MAIN AGRICULTURAL UNIT WHERE POSSIBLE; |
| |
PARTICULAR ATTENTION WILL BE PAID
TO THE LANDSCAPE AND TRAFFIC IMPACTS OF FARM SHOPS WITHIN AONBs. |
| |
|
| |
The Loss of Rural Shops |
| 3.5.56 |
Proposals for the conversion of rural shops to non-A1
retail use will be permitted where it can be demonstrated that committed
attempts have been made to market the shop as a retail business. Evidence
will be required that the shop has been advertised for sale in the
appropriate or local and trade press at a realistic price or rent
on more than two occasions over period of at least one year and that
no reasonable offers have been refused. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY S18 |
| |
IN THE RURAL AREA, PROPOSALS FOR
THE CONVERSION OF VILLAGE SHOPS TO NON-A1 RETAIL USE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED
UNLESS IT CAN BE DEMONSTRATED THAT THE SHOP IS NO LONGER VIABLE |
| |
|
|
| |
Food and Drink Uses Outside Town Centres |
| 3.5.57 |
Restaurants, pubs and hot food takeaways can cause
noise, smell, traffic, parking problems and late night disturbance.
Where such uses may cause problems, planning permission may be limited
to the specific use applied for. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY S19 |
| |
IN THE URBAN AREA OUTSIDE THE CENTRES
OF LANCASTER AND MORECAMBE AND IN RURAL SETTLEMENTS, A3 (FOOD AND
DRINK) USES WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED WHERE THEY; |
| |
|
WOULD NOT RESULT IN UNACCEPTABLE
ADVERSE EFFECTS ON THE AMENITIES OF ADJOINING RESIDENTS AND OTHER
NEIGHBOURING USES IN TERMS OF NOISE, SMELL AND DISTURBANCE; AND |
| |
|
WOULD NOT CAUSE SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC
OR CAR PARKING PROBLEMS. |
| |
WHERE THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THAT
SUCH A USE MAY CAUSE DISTURBANCE AT UNSOCIAL HOURS, THE COUNCIL MAY
IMPOSE CONDITIONS LIMITING THE USE AND HOURS OF OPENING OF THE PROPOSED
FOOD AND DRINK USE. |
| |
|
| |
Retail Development in Mixed-Use Schemes |
| 3.5.58 |
Some non-retail or mixed-use developments may include
a retail element. These include shops within tourist and leisure developments,
golf club shops, employee shops within business and industrial development
and on campus shopping in higher education institutions, hospitals
and prisons. In all such cases, the retail element should be considered
on the same basis as other retail schemes and satisfy Policy S1 and
Policy S2. Where such development is permitted, the range of goods
sold may be limited by condition to control future changes of use. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY S20 |
| |
PLANNING PERMISSION FOR RETAIL DEVELOPMENT
WHICH IS ANCILLARY TO THE MAIN USE OF THE SITE WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED
WHERE THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT BY REASON OF ITS SCALE AND RANGE OF
GOODS SOLD CAN BE SHOWN NOT TO HARM THE VITALITY AND VIABILITY OF
EXISTING SHOPPING CENTRES. |
| |
Policy Not Saved with effect from 27 September 2007 |
| |
|
|
| |
The Loss of Rural Food and Drink Outlets |
| 3.5.59 |
Rural food and drink establishments and village public
houses in particular are often important local facilities. Research
undertaken by Oxford Brookes University has highlighted the role of
rural public houses as providers of essential facilities in villages,
as employers and as visitor attractions. The importance of rural pubs
is recognised in the Rural White Paper and the Rural Development Commission's
Rural Pubs Initiative. |
| 3.5.60 |
Within Lancaster District, the Green Dragon in Whittington
contains the village Post Office. In villages such as Whittington,
Melling, and Burrow, public houses have survived where there is no
village shop. Like village shops, public houses are vulnerable and
subject to pressure for residential conversion and decisions on their
future may be conditioned by the expectation of a residential after
use. It is vital that the importance of public houses and other food
and drink establishments to village communities is taken fully into
account in considering proposals affecting them. |
| 3.5.61 |
Proposals for the conversion of food and drink establishments
to residential use will normally have to demonstrate that committed
attempts have been made to market the business as a going concern.
Evidence will be required that the premises has been advertised in
the appropriate local and trade press at a realistic price or rent
on more than two occasions over a period of at least one year and
that no reasonable offers have been refused. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY S21 |
| |
IN THE COUNTRYSIDE AREA, PROPOSALS
FOR THE CHANGE OF USE OF FOOD AND DRINK ESTABLISHMENTS TO RESIDENTIAL
OR OTHER USES WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED WHERE THE BUSINESS CAN BE DEMONSTRATED
TO BE NO LONGER VIABLE. |
|
|
|
| 3.6 |
Tourism and Commercial Leisure
Development |
| |
Tourism in the Local Economy |
| 3.6.1 |
Tourism is a major sector of the local economy employing
around 1000 people directly and many more in the hotel and catering
sectors. Visitor spending also benefits the District's shopping centres.
The District has many visitor attractions. Morecambe provides traditional
seaside attractions, modern leisure facilities, public art and pavement
games. The historic city of Lancaster offers museums, parks, the canalside
area and a developing shopping centre. |
| 3.6.2 |
The Forest of Bowland and Arnside/Silverdale Areas
of Outstanding Natural Beauty provide informal quiet recreation. Other
rural attractions include the Pine Lake leisure complex, the Lancaster
Canal and the outstanding wildlife areas of Morecambe Bay and the
Lune Estuary. |
| 3.6.3 |
Tourism is an area where the District has advantages
possessed by few. With its outstanding urban and rural landscapes,
its attractions, motorway connections and proximity to the Lake District,
the Yorkshire Dales and Blackpool, the District is well positioned
to attract more visitors. |
| 3.6.4 |
The District's existing tourist attractions must be
safeguarded and enhanced. The regeneration of Morecambe must be continued.
New visitor attractions must be developed including raising the profile
of the City of Lancaster and developing Carnforth's railway heritage. |
| |
|
| |
The Regeneration of Morecambe |
| 3.6.5 |
Morecambe has adjusted to the loss of its traditional
seaside holiday market by developing new commercial leisure attractions
and upgrading its environment with new public art based on the bird
life of Morecambe Bay. It now has a cinema, ten-pin bowling, leisure
swimming and public art. Many of these facilities benefit local residents
as well as visitors. The concentration of leisure facilities in a
quality environment is one of Morecambe's strengths which will be
encouraged and developed. New visitor attractions should also reflect
its outstanding natural environment. |
| 3.6.6 |
Much remains to be done. Extensive repair work has
now begun to the Victoria Pavilion (Winter Gardens). The 1930s art
deco Midland Hotel is in need of substantial investment. The eastern
sea front and some of the shops and cafes along it need upgrading. |
| 3.6.7 |
Phase 5 of the Morecambe coastal defence works, covering
the entire eastern seafront has now begun. This has created the opportunity
to incorporate new public art and pavement games and provide an interpretation
centre adjacent to Green Street subject to lottery funding. Development
which could prejudice the regeneration of Morecambe will be resisted. |
| 3.6.8 |
The existing Development Brief for the area has now
largely been implemented and a revised Development Brief will be produced
in due course. |
| 3.6.9 |
The Council's development strategy for the area incorporates
the following elements; |
| |
- an interpretation and visitor centre on land adjoining Green
Street slipway;
- upgraded parks and gardens with new public art and pavement
games;
- restoration and re-use of the Victoria Pavilion (Winter Gardens);
- traffic calming and remodelling of Marine Road; and
- upgrading of the area around the Midland Hotel.
|
|
|
|
| |
POLICY TO1 |
| |
WITHIN THE MORECAMBE TOURISM OPPORTUNITY
AREA, NEW COMMERCIAL LEISURE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE PERMITTED WHICH WOULD; |
| |
|
ENHANCE MORECAMBE AS A VISITOR ATTRACTION;
AND |
| |
|
MAKE A POSITIVE CONTRIBUTION TO THE
REGENERATION OF THE AREA THROUGH SENSITIVE DESIGN AND USE OF MATERIALS
AND APPROPRIATE ADVERTISING AND SHOPFRONT DESIGN. |
| |
DEVELOPMENTS WHICH WOULD PREJUDICE
THE TOURISM AND LEISURE ROLE OF MORECAMBE TOWN CENTRE WILL NOT BE
PERMITTED |
| |
Policy wholly superseded by policies within the Core Strategy with effect from 23 July 2008 |
| |
|
| |
Tourism in Lancaster |
| 3.6.10 |
Although its profile as a visitor destination is rising,
Lancaster could make more of its tourism assets. It attracts fewer
visitors than many other historic cities. The City has a number of
high quality tourist attractions and the potential of Lancaster Castle
is substantial, particularly if combined with the St George's Quay
area. |
| 3.6.11 |
Although there is already limited visitor access to
the Castle and extensive improvements to the Castle surroundings have
already been carried out including the relocation of the Tourist Information
Centre, the Castle cannot fully realise its tourism potential whilst
it continues to be used as a prison. In the long term, the development
of the Castle as a visitor attraction would be of enormous assistance
to Lancaster in realising its tourism potential and it is vital to
the long-term future of the City that this interest be safeguarded. |
| |
THE COUNCIL WILL CONTINUE TO ENCOURAGE THE USE OF
THE CASTLE PRECINCT AS A VISITOR DESTINATION. IN THE EVENT OF LANCASTER
CASTLE BEING DECLARED SURPLUS TO REQUIREMENTS, THE COUNCIL WILL WORK
WITH THE COUNTY COUNCIL AND OTHER RELEVANT BODIES TO PREPARE AN ACTION
PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CASTLE AND ST GEORGE'S QUAY AREA AS
A MAJOR TOURIST ATTRACTION |
| |
|
| |
Tourism Opportunities Elsewhere in the
District |
| |
Carnforth |
| 3.6.12 |
One of the District's major attractions, the Steamtown
Railway Centre has recently been significantly scaled down. The site
retains major potential for a rail based tourism attraction containing
extensive locomotive and carriage sheds, sidings, coaling facilities,
a turntable and a coach park close to the M6 and with a direct connection
onto two of the Country's most scenic rail routes - around the Cumbrian
Coast and across the Yorkshire Dales. It is essential that this potential
is safeguarded and that every effort is made to attract a new rail
based attraction to the site. |
| 3.6.13 |
Steamtown also adjoins Carnforth Station which, despite
its historic association with the development of the railways and
the film 'Brief Encounter' remains under-used and in poor condition.
The opportunity exists for a tourism development based around the
station which could develop links with Steamtown. |
| |
|
| |
Pine Lakes, Carnforth |
| 3.6.14 |
Pine Lakes, north of Carnforth, is one of the District's
most successful tourism developments. A variety of leisure opportunities
have been created out of a series of redundant gravel pits. There
is scope for the limited expansion of leisure uses on this site. There
may also be scope in the longer term to expand into the area immediately
to the north of the site, which is currently used for gravel extraction,
upon cessation of this use. |
| |
|
| |
South Heysham |
| 3.6.15 |
The former Middleton Towers Holiday Camp and adjacent
caravan park represent an area in urgent need of renewal. The holiday
camp site offers the opportunity to develop a modern tourist attraction
without causing significant harm to the coastal environment. The site
will also benefit from the proximity of the Community Woodland (see
Policy E26) which will reduce the impact of the past industrial uses
in the area. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY TO2 |
| |
THE FOLLOWING AREAS IDENTIFIED ON
THE LOCAL PLAN PROPOSALS MAP ARE ALLOCATED AS TOURISM OPPORTUNITY
AREAS; |
| |
MORECAMBE CENTRE
LANCASTER CASTLE & ST GEORGE'S QUAY
STEAMTOWN, CARNFORTH
PINE LAKES, CARNFORTH
SOUTH HEYSHAM |
| |
THE COUNCIL WILL DIRECT NEW VISITOR
ATTRACTIONS TO THESE AREAS. PROPOSALS WHICH WOULD PREJUDICE THE POSSIBILITY
OF ACHIEVING NEW VISITOR ATTRACTIONS WITHIN THESE AREAS WILL NOT BE
PERMITTED. |
| |
|
| |
TOGETHER WITH THE RELEVANT LAND OWNERS AND OPERATORS,
THE COUNCIL WILL PREPARE A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE IMPROVEMENT
AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE SOUTH HEYSHAM AREA |
| |
|
| |
Rural Tourism |
| 3.6.16 |
The District's outstanding rural landscapes provide
wide-ranging opportunities for quiet tourism and recreation development
which could benefit the local economy. Insensitive tourism development
can be highly damaging to the rural environment in terms of visual
impact, habitat destruction and traffic generated. Small-scale tourism
development such as visitor accommodation, craft workshops, galleries,
catering facilities, information and interpretation facilities and
quiet recreation, such as fishing and cycling can be satisfactorily
integrated into the rural scene if sensitively designed. It can contribute
to the diversity of the countryside, attract more visitors and create
jobs. |
| 3.6.17 |
New visitor facilities will be encouraged within rural
settlements and other suitable locations such as within farm complexes
or existing rural buildings in the countryside where they do not,
in themselves or in combination with existing tourism development,
cause significant harm to their surroundings. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY TO3 |
| |
PROPOSALS FOR SMALL-SCALE TOURIST-RELATED
USES IN RURAL SETTLEMENTS, FARM BUILDING GROUPS AND EXISTING BUILDINGS
IN THE COUNTRYSIDE WILL BE PERMITTED WHERE THE PROPOSAL; |
| |
|
IS APPROPRIATE IN TERMS OF SCALE,
DESIGN AND LANDSCAPING TO THE SITE AND ITS SURROUNDINGS; |
| |
|
WOULD NOT RESULT IN A SIGNIFICANT
ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE AMENITIES OF ADJOINING RESIDENTS OR BUSINESSES; |
| |
|
WOULD NOT GENERATE TRAFFIC LIKELY
TO CAUSE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE CHARACTER OF THE AREA
OR INCREASE ACCIDENT RISK; |
| |
|
IS NOT PREJUDICED BY THE OPERATION
OF THE FARM WITHIN WHICH IT IS LOCATED (IF ANY); |
| |
|
MAKES SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR
ACCESS, SERVICING AND CYCLE AND CAR PARKING; |
| |
|
IS EASILY ACCESSIBLE TO PEDESTRIANS
AND CYCLISTS FROM SURROUNDING ROADS AND RIGHTS OF WAY; AND |
| |
|
MAKES REASONABLE PROVISION FOR PUBLIC
TRANSPORT WHERE THE DEVELOPMENT WOULD BE LIKELY TO SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASE
THE DEMAND FOR TRAVEL. |
| |
|
| |
Major Tourism Development in Rural Areas |
| 3.6.18 |
Large scale recreation development should, wherever
possible, be directed to the main urban area. Some types of tourism
and recreation development can only take place in rural areas, either
because they require large areas of land or because there are no suitable
sites in the urban areas. |
| 3.6.19 |
In exceptional circumstances, where large-scale tourism
and recreation development in the rural area would provide new attractions,
generate new jobs or provide new uses for existing rural buildings,
development may be permitted. The need to protect the District's outstanding
landscape quality means that such development must be very closely
controlled and, if permitted, screened to protect the landscape. Noise
and light impacts must also be closely controlled. The surrounding
countryside and nearby villages must not suffer significantly increased
traffic generation or levels of activity in the area. Good quality
agricultural land should be safeguarded. Wildlife habitats and public
rights of way should be protected and enhanced. Development attracting
large numbers of people from the urban area should be close to Lancaster
and Morecambe and accessible by public transport. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY TO4 |
| |
WITHIN RURAL SETTLEMENTS AND THE
COUNTRYSIDE, LARGE SCALE TOURISM DEVELOPMENT WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED
WHERE THERE ARE CLEAR ENVIRONMENTAL OR BUILDING CONSERVATION BENEFITS
AND THE PROPOSAL; |
| |
|
DOES NOT LIE WITHIN AN AREA OF OUTSTANDING
NATURAL BEAUTY; |
| |
|
WOULD NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE
EFFECT ON THE APPEARANCE AND RURAL CHARACTER OF THE AREA INCLUDING
THE IMPACTS OF LIGHT AND NOISE; |
| |
|
WOULD NOT GENERATE TRAFFIC LIKELY
TO CAUSE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE CHARACTER OF THE AREA
OR INCREASE ACCIDENT RISK; |
| |
|
MAKES SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR
ACCESS, SERVICING AND CAR PARKING; |
| |
|
IS EASILY ACCESSIBLE TO PEDESTRIANS
AND CYCLISTS FROM SURROUNDING ROADS AND RIGHTS OF WAY; |
| |
|
WOULD NOT HAVE A SERIOUS ADVERSE
EFFECT ON NATURE CONSERVATION INTERESTS INCLUDING PROTECTED SPECIES; |
| |
|
MAKES REASONABLE PROVISION FOR PUBLIC
TRANSPORT WHERE THE DEVELOPMENT WOULD BE LIKELY TO SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASE
THE DEMAND FOR TRAVEL; AND |
| |
|
IN THE CASE OF DEVELOPMENT LIKELY
TO BE USED BY PEOPLE FROM NEARBY URBAN AREAS, IT IS CLOSE TO AND EASILY
ACCESSIBLE FROM THESE AREAS. |
| |
|
|
| |
Caravans |
| 3.6.20 |
The District contains around 4000 static and touring
caravan pitches. Although caravan sites provide visitor accommodation
and contribute to the local economy, they can have a detrimental impact
on the countryside. Because of the substantial existing provision,
the poor appearance of many sites and the sensitivity of much of the
District's landscape, caravan development should be limited to modest
extensions. The Forest of Bowland and Arnside/Silverdale Areas of
Outstanding Natural Beauty are particularly unsuitable for additional
caravan development. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY TO5 |
| |
WITHIN THE ARNSIDE/SILVERDALE AND
FOREST OF BOWLAND AREAS OF OUTSTANDING NATURAL BEAUTY, PROPOSALS FOR
NEW STATIC OR TOURING CARAVAN SITES OR THE EXTENSION OF EXISTING SITES
WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. |
| |
|
|
| 3.6.21 |
Even outside the Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty,
much of the landscape is of outstanding quality. Caravan development
would have an unacceptable impact on the countryside in many areas. |
| 3.6.22 |
Static caravans, being larger and permanent, have a
worse visual impact than touring caravans and no new static caravan
sites should be established. Modest increases in the number of vans
on a site will occasionally be acceptable where linked to better landscaping
or improvement of on site facilities and where such increases can
be accommodated within existing site boundaries or through minor extensions
which will not harm the surrounding countryside or neighbouring properties. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY TO6 |
| |
OUTSIDE THE AREAS OF OUTSTANDING
NATURAL BEAUTY, PROPOSALS FOR NEW STATIC CARAVAN SITES WILL NOT BE
PERMITTED. THE SMALL-SCALE EXTENSION OF EXISTING SITES WILL ONLY BE
PERMITTED PROVIDED THAT: |
| |
|
THE PROPOSAL WOULD RESULT IN A DEMONSTRABLE
IMPROVEMENT TO ON-SITE FACILITIES AND/OR LANDSCAPING; AND |
| |
|
THERE ARE NO ADVERSE EFFECTS ON THE
SURROUNDING COUNTRYSIDE OR NEIGHBOURING PROPERTIES. |
| |
|
| 3.6.23 |
Touring caravans tend to be less intrusive than static
caravans. There are fewer pitches most of which are unoccupied in
winter. Nevertheless the District's landscape quality and the unsuitability
of many rural roads justify a cautious approach. |
| 3.6.24 |
New development should be restricted to small-scale
facilities where siting and landscaping can prevent poor visual impact
and where the local road network is suitable. Open countryside locations
are usually unsuitable and the best locations are often adjacent to
farm buildings and other rural businesses or achieved through small-scale
extensions to existing sites. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY TO7 |
| |
NEW TOURING CARAVAN SITES OR EXTENSIONS
TO EXISTING FACILITIES WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED WHERE THE PROPOSAL: |
| |
|
CAN BE DEMONSTRATED TO HAVE NO SIGNIFICANT
ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE APPEARANCE OF THE SURROUNDING COUNTRYSIDE OR
ON THE AMENITIES OF NEIGHBOURING USES; |
| |
|
CAN BE DEMONSTRATED NOT TO GIVE RISE
TO SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC CONGESTION OR INCREASED ACCIDENT RISK |
| |
|
MAKES SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR
ACCESS SERVICING AND CYCLE AND CAR PARKING; AND |
| |
|
IS EASILY ACCESSIBLE TO PEDESTRIANS
AND CYCLISTS FROM SURROUNDING ROADS AND RIGHTS OF WAY |
| |
|
| 3.6.25 |
There is increasing pressure for longer opening seasons
for caravan sites. A longer opening season could assist the local
economy, particularly in Morecambe where further all year indoor entertainment
facilities have been developed. However the impact of a longer season
on the landscape and nature conservation and shorter 'recovery time'
will also be taken into account. Increased returns arising out of
a longer season must be reflected in on-site improvements. Proposals
to extend the season must be accompanied by enhancement proposals. |
| 3.6.26 |
Most caravans are unsuitable for permanent occupation.
To prevent the use of caravans as permanent homes and to allow some
time for sites to recover, planning approvals will require that the
site remains closed for a minimum six week period. This period will
normally be during the first six months of the year. Where necessary
a Section 106 agreement will be negotiated to ensure that this requirement
is met. |
|
|
|
| |
POLICY TO8 |
| |
PROPOSALS TO EXTEND THE SEASON OF
EXISTING CARAVAN SITES WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED WHERE: |
| |
|
THERE WOULD BE NO SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE
IMPACT ON THE SURROUNDINGS OR ON NATURE CONSERVATION INTERESTS; |
| |
|
A PROGRAMME OF ON SITE IMPROVEMENTS
IS AGREED WITH THE LOCAL PLANNING AUTHORITY AND IMPLEMENTED BEFORE
THE EXTENDED OPEN SEASON BEGINS; |
| |
|
CARAVANS REMAIN IN HOLIDAY USE AND
ARE NOT USED FOR PERMANENT OCCUPATION; AND |
| |
|
THE SITE REMAINS CLOSED FOR A CONTINUOUS
SIX WEEK PERIOD BETWEEN JANUARY 1st AND MARCH 31st. |
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |